Abstract

Improvements in stage isentropic efficiency and reductions in total pressure loss are sought in a 1.5 stage axial turbine. This is representative of power generation equipment used in thermal power cycles, which delivers about 80% of the 20 × 1012 kWh world-wide electricity. Component-level improvements are therefore timely and important toward achieving carbon dioxide global emission targets. Secondary flow loss reduction is sought by applying a nonaxisymmetric endwall design to the turbine stator hub. A guide groove directs the pressure side branch of the horseshoe vortex away from the airfoil suction side, using a parametric endwall hub surface, which is defined as to obtain first-order smooth boundary connections to the remainder of the passage geometry. This delays the onset of the passage vortex and reduces its associated loss. The Automatic Process and Optimization Workbench (apow) generates a Kriging surrogate model from a set of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations, which is used to optimize the hub surface. The three-dimensional steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model with an axisymmetric hub is validated against reference experimental measurements from the Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen. Comparative computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions with an optimized nonaxisymmetric hub show a decrease in the total pressure loss coefficient and an increase in the isentropic stage efficiency at and off design conditions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call