Abstract

The tumor suppressor bridging integrator 1 (BIN1) is a corepressor of the transcription factor E2F1 and inhibits cell-cycle progression. BIN1 also curbs cellular poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) and increases sensitivity of cancer cells to DNA-damaging therapeutic agents such as cisplatin. However, how BIN1 deficiency, a hallmark of advanced cancer cells, increases cisplatin resistance remains elusive. Here, we report that BIN1 inactivates ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) serine/threonine kinase, particularly when BIN1 binds E2F1. BIN1 + 12A (a cancer-associated BIN1 splicing variant) also inhibited cellular PARylation, but only BIN1 increased cisplatin sensitivity. BIN1 prevented E2F1 from transcriptionally activating the human ATM promoter, whereas BIN1 + 12A did not physically interact with E2F1. Conversely, BIN1 loss significantly increased E2F1-dependent formation of MRE11A/RAD50/NBS1 DNA end-binding protein complex and efficiently promoted ATM autophosphorylation. Even in the absence of dsDNA breaks (DSBs), BIN1 loss promoted ATM-dependent phosphorylation of histone H2A family member X (forming γH2AX, a DSB biomarker) and mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1, a γH2AX-binding adaptor protein for DSB repair). Of note, even in the presence of transcriptionally active (i.e. proapoptotic) TP53 tumor suppressor, BIN1 loss generally increased cisplatin resistance, which was conversely alleviated by ATM inactivation or E2F1 reduction. However, E2F2 or E2F3 depletion did not recapitulate the cisplatin sensitivity elicited by E2F1 elimination. Our study unveils an E2F1-specific signaling circuit that constitutively activates ATM and provokes cisplatin resistance in BIN1-deficient cancer cells and further reveals that γH2AX emergence may not always reflect DSBs if BIN1 is absent.

Highlights

  • The tumor suppressor bridging integrator 1 (BIN1) is a corepressor of the transcription factor E2F1 and inhibits cell-cycle progression

  • As reported previously (27, 31), overexpression of BIN1 inhibited formation of oncogenic foci in rat embryonic primary fibroblasts (REFs)

  • In human DU145 cell line, BIN1 did not inhibit the colony formation as efficiently as in LNCaP cells (Fig. 1C). This was not because BIN1 was entirely dormant in this advanced cancer cell line

Read more

Summary

ARTICLE cro

Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, the ‡‡Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology Graduate Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, and the §§Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science and Mathematics, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia 30904

Edited by Patrick Sung
Results
Discussion
Mammalian cell lines
Plasmid DNAs
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis
In situ immunofluorescence analysis
Oncogenic transformation assay
Colony formation assay
Trypan blue exclusion assay
Statistical analysis
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.