Abstract

The problems of diminishing return apply to revision surgery very aptly. On the one hand is the inability to eradicate infection with various antibiotic combinations, while on the other is the ever diminishing bone stock for component fixation. Although pseudarthrosis still is, and must be accepted as, the inevitable outcome in some cases, every effort must be made to preserve or even increase the bone stock. In order to preserve bone stock, revisions need to be timely, while efforts to improve the bone stock may be made at the time of surgery. It is correct to say that at this stage the author’s experience with bone grafting in revision surgery is rather limited, for several reasons. Revisions are undertaken early whenever possible. On the acetabular side the concept of “rim support” for the socket has been actively pursued for a number of years, with some success. On the femoral side excavation of the lesser trochanter for stem support postero-medially has been carried out routinely in revisions. It is the loss of bone stock beyond the level of the lesser trochanter that demands alternative stem designs and methods of support.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.