Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to verify that discrete statistical distributions of the US stock market are consistent with loss aversion. Loss aversion has the following tenets: an S-shaped valuation function, characterized by diminishing sensitivity, a loss aversion coefficient higher than +1, probability weighting, and reference-dependence. Diminishing sensitivity implies that the exponent of the valuation function is between 0 and +1. It is expected that this exponent be higher for losses. Probability weighting replaces objective with subjective probabilities. Loss aversion is indicated by a coefficient higher than +1 for the valuation of losses. There are three parameters: the two exponents of the valuation function, and the loss aversion coefficient. There is one non-linear equation: the certainty equivalence relation. The procedure is to fix two parameters and find the third parameter by solving the non-linear certainty equivalence equation, using the EXCEL spreadsheet. The program is repeated for more than one case about the fixed parameters, and by enriching the analysis with probability weighting. The calibrations executed point strongly to the conclusion that loss aversion is consistent with six discrete distributions of the first two moments of returns of the US stock markets. The calibration process provides for reasonable estimates of the key parameters of loss aversion. These estimates suggest a more pronounced diminishing sensitivity, and a higher than expected coefficient of loss aversion, especially when probability weighting is imposed.

Highlights

  • Loss aversion is at the heart of behavioral finance and behavioral economics

  • It is noticed that the higher the loss aversion coefficient is the higher is α

  • Loss aversion is a key concept in behavioral finance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Loss aversion is at the heart of behavioral finance and behavioral economics. In this contemporary field of economic science, and unlike other specialties, at least five different Nobel Prize winners in economics were awarded the prestigious recognition of excellence. The story begins with Herbert Simon, a 1978 laureate, “for his pioneering research into the decisionmaking process within economic organizations", and his notions of bounded rationality and satisfying behavior. The second is Daniel Kahneman in 2002 "for having integrated insights from psychological research into economic science, especially concerning human judgment and decision-making under uncertainty". Kahneman developed his work, denominated prospect theory, with the help of Tversky, and both have pioneered the application of psychology to economics The third winner is Richard Thaler in 2017 for “his contributions to behavioral economics”, some of which are in Camerer et al (2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call