Abstract

Experimental research in health economics has analyzed the effects of economic preference parameters such as risk attitude and time preference on the probability of adopting risky health behaviors. However, the existing evidence is mixed and previous research often fails to include controls for other determinants of health behaviors such as personality traits. The aim of this research is to analyze the relationships between an incentivized measure of loss aversion and three health behaviors: smoking, binge drinking, and engaging in physical activity. Loss aversion is a preference measure that has been derived from prospect theory as an alternative approach to analyze decision-making under risk, such as the decision to invest in health capital, and has never been used in an analysis of the determinants of health behaviors before. Using two experimental samples of college students in the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, and controlling for Big Five personality traits and a host of individual-level control variables, there are no statistically significant relationships between loss aversion and the three aforementioned health behaviors, but relationships for Big Five conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. A candidate explanation might be lack of domain independence for loss aversion. Differences between the Korean and the US samples indicate the possibility of intercultural differences.

Highlights

  • There is a substantial literature of economic experiments using risk attitude and time preference to predict health behaviors, but the results are mixed

  • The aim of this research is to focus on three health behaviors that are linked to substantial negative health outcomes (consumption of alcohol, smoking, and physical activity) and analyze their relationship with loss aversion

  • The aim of this research note was to test if loss aversion is a determinant of three risky health behaviors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a substantial literature of economic experiments using risk attitude and time preference to predict health behaviors, but the results are mixed (see [1] or [2] for surveys or [3]). Loss aversion refers to the prediction in prospect theory that individuals are typically more sensitive towards losses than towards gains [12], leading to the hypothesis that, with human capital being a risky investment ([13,14,15] for educational investment, Asano and Shibata’s [16] extension of Grossman’s [17] model for health investment), individuals who exhibit a higher degree of loss aversion should be less likely to engage in health behaviors linked to increased probabilities of fatal outcomes such as smoking Those predictions from behavioral economic theory could be used in the design of prevention programs, especially when deciding about criteria for inclusion in programs.

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call