Abstract
Paul Ricoeur, known as a reader of paradoxes, interprets Kierkegaard's philosophy “paradoxically” in two ways. This exception represents the paradoxical relationship of all philosophical work with the particular existence that is the philosopher, existence that must be understood as the non-philosophical source of every philosophy. The second one refers to the inside of his philosophy. In this sense, his conceptual developments represent the incompleteness of the philosophical system when it has to deal with the issue of evil: an unsolvable enigma that is thematized at the center of existence as anguish and despair. From this point of view, we formulate the question: “how can we understand the philosophical work after Kierkegaard?” and our answer claims that this meaning goes beyond philosophy itself. It consists in starting at the existence that nourishes philosophy, and enables the never-ending treatment of philosophical procedure.
Highlights
Paul Ricoeur, known as a reader of paradoxes, interprets Kierkegaard’s philosophy “paradoxically” in two ways. This exception represents the paradoxical relationship of all philosophical work with the particular existence that is the philosopher, existence that must be understood as the non-philosophical source of every philosophy
The second one refers to the inside of his philosophy. His conceptual developments represent the incompleteness of the philosophical system when it has to deal with the issue of evil: an unsolvable enigma that is thematized at the center of existence as anguish and despair. From this point of view, we formulate the question: “how can we understand the philosophical work after Kierkegaard?”, and our answer claims that this meaning goes beyond philosophy itself
Filosofar después de Kierkegaard es, a su vez, pensar a la filosofía a partir de la imposibilidad de la construcción del sistema: la paradoja, la anti-dialéctica, la irresolución, o lo que es lo mismo, pensar al absoluto desde la existencia
Summary
Paul Ricoeur, known as a reader of paradoxes, interprets Kierkegaard’s philosophy “paradoxically” in two ways. Los pseudónimos de una excepción o filosofar después de Kierkegaard según Paul Ricoeur
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
