Abstract
Covid-19 has not been experienced as a silent event, but has generated speeches. People in confinement express their views; in some cases, they construct arguments. We analyze typical cases where logic and emotionality are combined. The arguments are inclined either towards critical thinking or towards post-truth discourse. The effects are different. We resort to the current view on logical fallacies, to disengage from the more conventional line of study of argumentation (which denies affectivity) and fallacies (in their unilateral sense). We also rely on analogical hermeneutics. The argumentation is essential for the health prevention strategy of Education and Responsibility of the population, put into practice by some nations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
