Abstract
Gastrointestinal NursingVol. 14, No. 3 Penny's PageLord Carter's productivity report: implications for GI nursesPenny HarrisonPenny HarrisonSearch for more papers by this authorPenny HarrisonPublished Online:24 Apr 2016https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2016.14.3.58AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Carter P (2016) Operational Productivity and Performance in English NHS Acute Hospitals: Unwarranted Variation. Department of Health, London Google ScholarCarter H, Price L (2016a) Assessing the need for service improvement. Nursing Times 112(8): 15–17 Google ScholarCarter H, Price L (2016b) Managing and reviewing evidenced-based changes. Nursing Times 112(9): 14–7 Google ScholarDepartment of Health (2009) High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. The Stationary Office, London Google ScholarDepartment of Health (2010) Equality and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. The Stationery Office, London Google ScholarFoulds L, Timms K, Barwell J, Gunning A (2015) Incorporating the principles of nursing practice and the 6C's. Br J Nurs 24(5): S4–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup5.S4 Link, Google ScholarFredericks S, Lapum J, Hui G (2015) Examining the effect of patient-centred care on outcomes. Br J Nurs 24(7): 394–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.7.394 Link, Google ScholarNHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement (2010) High impact actions for nursing and midwifery: the essential collection. http://bit.ly/1WtEIsx (accessed 14 April 2016) Google ScholarNursing and Midwifery Council (2015) The Code: Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses and Midwives. NMC, London Google ScholarSpinks J (2016) Lord Carter's model hospitals aim to save NHS £5 billion a year. Nurs Stand 30(25): 12–3 Crossref, Google ScholarWestwood C, McConnell S (2016) Technological and organisational innovation in endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Nursing 14(2): 30–7 Link, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 2 April 2016Volume 14Issue 3ISSN (print): 1479-5248ISSN (online): 2052-2835 Metrics History Published online 24 April 2016 Published in print 2 April 2016 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
