Abstract

ABSTRACT Federal contracting is complicated by the conflict between system maintenance and the more intangible, normative goals of government. This study focuses on a federal procurement program that explicitly pursues equity as a normative goal in the contracting of services from small and disadvantaged businesses. For many federal agencies, low contract management capacity makes the pursuit of this goal difficult, prompting these agencies to focus on goals that are more proximate, easily achievable, and tangible. We argue that both behavioral and representative bureaucracy theories help explain how organizations can synthesize goals in this particular context, thereby reducing the propensity of federal agencies to displace equity for the more proximately achievable goal of system maintenance. Our findings indicate support for this argument. We discuss the contributions of this study to studies of goal displacement and, more generally, to theory integration in public management scholarship.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.