Abstract

To measure between-center variation in loop diuretic use in infants developing severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in US children's hospitals, and to compare mortality and age at discharge between infants from low-use centers and infants from high-use centers. We performed a retrospective cohort study of preterm infants at <32weeks of gestational age with severe BPD. The primary outcome was cumulative loop diuretic use, defined as the proportion of days with exposure between admission and discharge. Infant characteristics associated with loop diuretic use at P<.10 were included in multivariable models to adjust for center differences in case mix. Hospitals were ranked from lowest to highest in adjusted use and dichotomized into low-use centers and high-use centers. We then compared mortality and postmenstrual age at discharge between the groups through multivariable analyses. We identified 3252 subjects from 43 centers. Significant variation between centers remained despite adjustment for infant characteristics, with use present in an adjusted mean range of 7.3% to 49.4% of days (P<.0001). Mortality did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (aOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.62-1.53; P=.92), nor did postmenstrual age at discharge (marginal mean, 47.3weeks [95% CI, 46.8-47.9weeks] in the low-use group vs 47.4weeks [95% CI, 46.9-47.9weeks] in the high-use group; P=.96). A marked variation in loop diuretic use for infants developing severe BPD exists among US children's hospitals, without an observed difference in mortality or age at discharge. More research is needed to provide evidence-based guidance for this common exposure.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.