Abstract
AbstractThis note concernsLoomis–Whitney inequalitiesin Heisenberg groups$$\mathbb {H}^n$$Hn:$$\begin{aligned} |K| \lesssim \prod _{j=1}^{2n}|\pi _j(K)|^{\frac{n+1}{n(2n+1)}}, \qquad K \subset \mathbb {H}^n. \end{aligned}$$|K|≲∏j=12n|πj(K)|n+1n(2n+1),K⊂Hn.Here$$\pi _{j}$$πj,$$j=1,\ldots ,2n$$j=1,…,2n, are thevertical Heisenberg projectionsto the hyperplanes$$\{x_j=0\}$${xj=0}, respectively, and$$|\cdot |$$|·|refers to a natural Haar measure on either$$\mathbb {H}^n$$Hn, or one of the hyperplanes. The Loomis–Whitney inequality in the first Heisenberg group$$\mathbb {H}^1$$H1is a direct consequence of known$$L^p$$Lpimproving properties of the standard Radon transform in$$\mathbb {R}^2$$R2. In this note, we show how the Loomis–Whitney inequalities in higher dimensional Heisenberg groups can be deduced by an elementary inductive argument from the inequality in$$\mathbb {H}^1$$H1. The same approach, combined with multilinear interpolation, also yields the following strong type bound:$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\mathbb {H}^n} \prod _{j=1}^{2n} f_j(\pi _j(p))\;dp\lesssim \prod _{j=1}^{2n} \Vert f_j\Vert _{\frac{n(2n+1)}{n+1}} \end{aligned}$$∫Hn∏j=12nfj(πj(p))dp≲∏j=12n‖fj‖n(2n+1)n+1for all nonnegative measurable functions$$f_1,\ldots ,f_{2n}$$f1,…,f2non$$\mathbb {R}^{2n}$$R2n. These inequalities and their geometric corollaries are thus ultimately based on planar geometry. Among the applications of Loomis–Whitney inequalities in$$\mathbb {H}^n$$Hn, we mention the following sharper version of the classical geometric Sobolev inequality in$$\mathbb {H}^n$$Hn:$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u\Vert _{\frac{2n+2}{2n+1}} \lesssim \prod _{j=1}^{2n}\Vert X_ju\Vert ^{\frac{1}{2n}}, \qquad u \in BV(\mathbb {H}^n), \end{aligned}$$‖u‖2n+22n+1≲∏j=12n‖Xju‖12n,u∈BV(Hn),where$$X_j$$Xj,$$j=1,\ldots ,2n$$j=1,…,2n, are the standard horizontal vector fields in$$\mathbb {H}^n$$Hn. Finally, we also establish an extension of the Loomis–Whitney inequality in$$\mathbb {H}^n$$Hn, where the Heisenberg vertical coordinate projections$$\pi _1,\ldots ,\pi _{2n}$$π1,…,π2nare replaced by more general families of mappings that allow us to apply the same inductive approach based on the$$L^{3/2}$$L3/2-$$L^3$$L3boundedness of an operator in the plane.
Highlights
The Loomis–Whitney inequality in Rd bounds the volume of a set K ⊂ Rd by the areas of its coordinate projections: d |K| ≤ |πj ( K )| 1 d −1, j =1 (1.1)where πj (x1, . . . , xd ) = (x1, . . . , x j−1, x j+1, . . . , xd )
It arose as a complement to manuscript [23] with Tuomas Orponen, in which we reduced the proof of the Loomis–Whitney inequality for H1 to an incidence geometric problem in the plane that we resolved using the method of polynomial partitioning
Later we learned that the Loomis–Whitney inequality in the first Heisenberg group—and inequalities of similar type—had already been obtained earlier [18,19,32,38] by a Fourier-analytic approach or the so-called method of refinements, albeit not phrased in terms of Heisenberg projections
Summary
The Loomis–Whitney inequality in Rd bounds the volume of a set K ⊂ Rd by the areas of its coordinate projections: d. Whitney inequality in the first Heisenberg group—and inequalities of similar type—had already been obtained earlier [18,19,32,38] by a Fourier-analytic approach or the so-called method of refinements, albeit not phrased in terms of Heisenberg projections. In addition to acknowledging previous work, the aim of the present note is to show how the Loomis– Whitney inequality in Hn for n > 1 can be proven by induction, as the original inequality [37], but using the version in H1 as a base case. The inductive approach in the present note has the advantage of yielding certain strong-type endpoint inequalities, see Theorem 1.8, which are not covered by [42] or other literature we are aware of. For applications to geometric Sobolev and isoperimetric inequalities in Hn, the weak-type inequalities would be sufficient
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.