Abstract

Studies suggest a prioritization in the neural processing of looming sounds. A little explored issue is the relationship between this perceptual bias and the orienting and alerting auditory attention networks. The present study investigated the effect of a warning sound on the speed of response to a subsequent target sound (Experiment 1) and a possible influence of this type of cue sound on the auditory orientation of attention (Experiment 2). The results of the two experiments suggest a significant reduction in the reaction time for a subsequent target sound due to the previous presentation (500 ms) of a looming warning sound. There was no significant effect of the cue sound on auditory attention orientation.

Highlights

  • Estudos sugerem uma priorização no processamento neural de sons em movimento de aproximação

  • Alertness is commonly assessed by observing the motor response times to targets preceded by a warning signal (Johnston et al, 2019; Posner, 1978; Roberts et al, 2006) and studies suggest that looming sounds are prioritized when compared to receding sounds (Bach et al, 2009; Neuhoff, 2001)

  • The result of Experiment 1 suggests a prioritization of the action elicited by looming warning sounds (Bach et al, 2009; McCarthy & Olsen, 2017; Neuhoff, 1998, 2016, 2018; Seifritz et al, 2002)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Estudos sugerem uma priorização no processamento neural de sons em movimento de aproximação. Seifritz et al (2002), in a human study using brain imaging techniques, obtained results that suggest that looming sounds preferentially activate a wide neural network related to attention and motor responses. The human auditory system prioritizes looming sounds, identifying them as a possible imminent threat (Neuhoff, 2016, 2018) This prioritization activates a wide set of subcortical and cortical attention networks, which prepare the body for action (Callejas, Lupiàñez, & Pío Tudela, 2005; Johnston, Hennessey, & Leitão, 2019). This attentive selection of the information can presents particular characteristics in alertness and orientation of the attention, as well as in executive control (Pacheco-Unguetti, Acosta, Marqués, & Lupiáñez, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.