Abstract

Mobile eye-tracking was used to investigate the link between teacher gaze and student-rated teacher interpersonal behaviour. Teacher gaze was recorded for 10 min during a teacher-centred part of a naturally occurring lesson. The Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction was then administered to assess how UK students evaluated their teacher interpersonally in that lesson. Teachers conveyed greater dominance (or interpersonal agency) through increasing eye contact while asking questions (‘attentional gaze’). Teachers conveyed more interpersonal friendliness (or communion) through increasing eye contact while lecturing (‘communicative gaze’). Culture did not affect the way gaze was associated with students’ interpersonal perceptions.

Highlights

  • Hypothesis 1 specified that more attentional gaze should link with more agentic teacher interpersonal behaviour, whereas communicative gaze should predict more communing teacher interpersonal behaviour

  • As expected, increasing attentional gaze was found to predict anticlockwise-leaning teacher interpersonal behaviour at stage one, b = .14, s.e. = .05, t = 2.87, p = .002, whereas it was increasing communicative gaze related to clockwise-leaning teacher interpersonal behaviour, b = − .08, s.e. = .05, t = 1.49, p = .07 (Figure 3, in Supplementary Figures)

  • The present research began investigating the relationship between teacher gaze and teacher interpersonal behaviour

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Momentto-moment behaviours create an ever-evolving picture of who the teacher is so that the classroom environment in which students learn is continually morphing (Pennings and Mainhard 2016). To empirically explore this process, intensively changing teacher behaviours should be captured and summarised. We relate gaze to students’ perceptions of teachers’ interpersonal behaviour—the socioemotional atmosphere that teachers, by every level of their behaviour, generate. We explored whether the impact of teachers’ behaviour on student experiences differs across cultures, probing the cultural generalisability of our findings

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.