Abstract
Indonesia’s democracy has taken huge leaps since the starting of reformation in 1998, compared to Soeharto’s authoritarian ruling (New Order) from 1966 to May 21, 1998, and during Soekarno’s ruling from the country’s independence in 1945 until 1966. One year after Soeharto’s fall on May 21, 1998, Indonesia held its first democratically election on June 7, 1999. The election was contested by 48 political parties. In 2004, Indonesia for the first time held its direct presidential election. One year later, Indonesia held its first regional elections, where voters directly elect governors, regents and mayors. The question is on whether the current democratic practices have been in accordance with all democratic values as intended by Pancasila ideology as the basic foundation for Indonesia in all political actions? Pancasila: 1). The belief in one God, 2). Just and civilized humanity, 3). Indonesian unity, 4. Democracy under the wise guidance of representative consultation, 5). Social justice for all peoples of Indonesia. The country’s founding fathers formulated the understanding of democracy based the traditional practices of democracy at the grassroots level which have lasted for centuries throughout the country. However what happens now is that Indonesia just imitated the posture of Western/European democracy. It turns out that Indonesian democracy is very fragile because it does not have a tradition of democracy that grows independently from Indonesia's fertile soil itself, but democracy is taken from other cultures that have grown and developed in Europe and then transplanted in Indonesian soil. Therefore, the format for direct elections in Indonesia must be reviewed for improvement.
Highlights
State ideology Pancasila is often not considered vital as the foundation of Indonesian state
Is democracy as understood in Europe the same as democracy that developed in the Indonesian archipelago over the previous centuries, which was carried out since the era of the Indonesian Reformation in 1998 until now? At least the first two presidents of Indonesia, namely President Soekarno served for a period of 21 years (1945-1966) and President Soeharto who served for a period of 32 years (1966-1998) showed that the character of the royal model who wanted to rule as long as possible became very clear
This means that the content of democracy in Pancasila follows the notion of democracy in general, not pre-existing traditions
Summary
State ideology Pancasila is often not considered vital as the foundation of Indonesian state. DEBATE ON THE STATE FORM: KINGDOM VS DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM How is the content of democracy understood in Pancasila?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.