Abstract

Poor lipid degradation limits low-temperature anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater even when psychrophiles are used. We combined metagenomics and metaproteomics to find lipolytic bacteria and their potential, and actual, cold-adapted extracellular lipases in anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating domestic wastewater at 4 and 15 °C. Of the 40 recovered putative lipolytic metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), only three (Chlorobium, Desulfobacter, and Mycolicibacterium) were common and abundant (relative abundance ≥ 1%) in all reactors. Notably, some MAGs that represented aerobic autotrophs contained lipases. Therefore, we hypothesised that the lipases we found are not always associated with exogenous lipid degradation and can have other roles such as polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) accumulation/degradation and interference with the outer membranes of other bacteria. Metaproteomics did not provide sufficient proteome coverage for relatively lower abundant proteins such as lipases though the expression of fadL genes, long-chain fatty acid transporters, was confirmed for four genera (Dechloromonas, Azoarcus, Aeromonas and Sulfurimonas), none of which were recovered as putative lipolytic MAGs. Metaproteomics also confirmed the presence of 15 relatively abundant (≥ 1%) genera in all reactors, of which at least 6 can potentially accumulate lipid/polyhydroxyalkanoates. For most putative lipolytic MAGs, there was no statistically significant correlation between the read abundance and reactor conditions such as temperature, phase (biofilm and bulk liquid), and feed type (treated by ultraviolet light or not). Results obtained by metagenomics and metaproteomics did not confirm each other and extracellular lipases and lipolytic bacteria were not easily identifiable in the anaerobic membrane reactors used in this study. Further work is required to identify the true lipid degraders in these systems.

Highlights

  • Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater generates energy and produces much less sludge than the conventional activated sludge pro­ cess

  • Results obtained by metagenomics and metaproteomics did not confirm each other and extracellular lipases and lipolytic bacteria were not identifiable in the anaerobic membrane reactors used in this study

  • Only 40 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) had at least one putative lipase genes and met the accepted quality threshold to be selected as putative lipolytic MAGs (Supplementary File 2, Table S4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater generates energy and produces much less sludge than the conventional activated sludge pro­ cess. Lipids degrade more slowly than carbohydrates or proteins at low temperatures, forming the bulk of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the effluents (Petropoulos et al, 2018) and a lipid rich scum layer in the reactors (Soares et al, 2019). Operational interventions, such as a skimmer to remove the scum layer (Lettinga et al, 1984), may help but do not address the fundamental issues of compliance or energy recovery. The estimated methane yield from 1 g glycerol trioleate (an abundant nat­ ural lipid) is 1.08 L (at standard temperature and pressure) while for 1 g glucose this is only 0.37 L (Kim and Shin, 2010)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call