Abstract
Reverend Dr. James Hal Cone has unquestionably been a key architect in defining Black liberation theology. Trained in the Western theological tradition at Garrett Theological Seminary, Cone became an expert on the theology of Twentieth-century Swiss-German theologian Karl Barth. Cone’s study of Barth led to his 1965 doctoral dissertation, “The Doctrine of Man in the Theology of Karl Barth,” where he critically examined Barth’s Epistle to the Romans and Church Dogmatics. His contemporaries and more recent African American theologians and religious scholars have questioned the extent to which Karl Barth’s ideas shaped Cone’s Black theology. The purpose of this brief commentary is to review the major ideas in “The Doctrine of Man” and Black Theology and Black Power, his first book, to explore which theological concepts Cone borrows from Barth, if any, and how Cone utilizes them within his articulation of a Black theological anthropology and Black liberation theology.
Highlights
Black Power, his first book, to explore which theological concepts Cone borrows from Barth, if any, and how Cone utilizes them within his articulation of a Black theological anthropology and Black liberation theology
It is without question that ancestor Reverend Dr James Hal Cone has been one of the key architects in defining and shaping the Black liberation theological tradition
Methodist Episcopal bishop Henry McNeil Turner had already identified that a people’s creator must be a reflection of themselves, and the God of his people must be Black, Cone’s writings were one of the first academic texts to explore the relationship between the African American human condition and the working of God in the world, or in other words a Black theological anthropology (Carter 2014, pp.177–78; Cone 1984)
Summary
It is without question that ancestor Reverend Dr James Hal Cone has been one of the key architects in defining and shaping the Black liberation theological tradition. In 1969, African American theologians Charles Long and Gayraud Wilmore, among others, were the first to question the extent to which Cone’s concepts in Black Theology and Black Power were borrowed from Barth, Paul Tillich, and other white theologians (Cone 1981). I come to this reflection, which began during a seminary course on Karl Barth, seeking to tease out the trajectory of Cone’s early theological ideas In doing so, this brief article examines how Cone’s “The Doctrine of Man” unpacks Barth’s theological anthropology, as written in the Epistle to the Romans and Church Dogmatics. This brief article examines how Cone’s “The Doctrine of Man” unpacks Barth’s theological anthropology, as written in the Epistle to the Romans and Church Dogmatics It outlines how Cone reconsiders, reframes, and reconstructs Barth’s ideas in Black Theology and Black Power. Cone strategically utilize Barth’s ideas in the development of a Black theological anthropology? Is
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
