Abstract
After Congress revised the Bankruptcy Code in 2005, courts have taken divergent views about how to apply 11 U.S.C. § 522 in relation to state exemptions. Three main interpretations have developed: antiextraterritoriality, preemption, and state-specific. This Note advocates the state-specific approach, as it prevents forum shopping without rendering state exemption laws void or futile. The state-specific view requires courts to consider both state case law and public policy. When state statutes remain silent, courts applying the state-specific interpretation should liberally construe the exemption statutes in favor of the debtor and allow extraterritorial application.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
