Long-term tillage effects on soil organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon in a purple paddy soil of Southwest China

Abstract

The impact of conservation tillage practices on soil carbon has been of great interest in recent years. Conservation tillage might have the potential to enhance soil carbon accumulation and alter the depth distribution of soil carbon compared to conventional tillage based systems. Changes in the soil organic carbon (SOC) as influenced by tillage, are more noticeable under long-term rather than short-term tillage practices. The objective of this study was to determine the impacts of long-term tillage on SOC and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) status after 19years of four tillage treatments in a Hydragric Anthrosol. In this experiment four tillage systems included conventional tillage with rotation of rice and winter fallow system (CTF), conventional tillage with rotation of rice and rape system (CTR), no-till and ridge culture with rotation of rice and rape system (NT) and tillage and ridge culture with rotation of rice and rape system (TR). Soils were sampled in the spring of 2009 and sectioned into 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–50 and 50–60cm depth, respectively.Tillage effect on SOC was observed, and SOC concentrations were much larger under NT than the other three tillage methods in all soil depths from 0 to 60cm. The mean SOC concentration at 0–60cm soil depth followed the sequence: NT (22.74gkg−1)>CTF (14.57gkg−1)>TR (13.10gkg−1)>CTR (11.92gkg−1). SOC concentrations under NT were significantly higher than TR and CTR (P<0.01), and higher than CTF treatment (P<0.05). The SOC storage was calculated on equivalent soil mass basis. Results showed that the highest SOC storage at 0–60cm depth presented in NT, which was 158.52Mg C ha−1, followed by CTF (106.74Mg C ha−1), TR (93.11Mg C ha−1) and CTR (88.60Mg C ha−1). Compared with conventional tillage (CTF), the total SOC storage in NT increased by 48.51%, but decreased by 16.99% and 12.77% under CTR and TR treatments, respectively. The effect of tillage on DOC was significant at 0–10cm soil layer, and DOC concentration was much higher under CTF than the other three treatments (P<0.01). Throughout 0–60cm soil depth, DOC concentrations were 32.92, 32.63, 26.79 and 22.10mgkg−1 under NT, CTF, CTR and TR, and the differences among the four treatments were not significant (P>0.05). In conclusion, NT increased SOC concentration and storage compared to conventional tillage operation but not for DOC.