Abstract

Definitive guidelines for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) do not exist. This study has focused on the repeat surgery when analyzing the survival outcomes of recurrent ICC. We evaluated the relationship between clinicopathological features of the primary tumor and implementation of the repeat surgery to identify its potential selection criteria. A total of 108 patients with recurrent ICC between 1993 and 2015 were analyzed. Of these, 15 patients underwent repeat surgery and 93 did not. Seven out of 29 patients with intrahepatic recurrence and eight out of 44 patients with extrahepatic recurrence were amenable to the repeat surgery. Thirty-five patients with simultaneous or consequent intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic recurrence were not amenable to the repeat surgery. Patients who underwent repeat surgery had a lower proportion of lymph node metastases (n=0 [0%] vs. n=47 [50.5%], p<0.001), multiple tumors in the primary tumor (n=1 [6.7%] vs. n=31 [33.3%], p=0.037), or early recurrence (≤1year; n=4 [26.7%] vs. n=62 [66.7%], p=0.003). Survival after recurrence (SAR) was better in patients who underwent repeat surgery than in those who did not (median SAR time: 91.6 vs. 10.4months, and 3-year survival: 86.7 vs. 8.7%, respectively, p<0.001). Repeat surgery for recurrent ICC with an appropriate selection can be associated with prolonged survival. Regarding the feasibility, nodal status, number of tumors on the primary tumor, and time to recurrence may be considered as selection criteria.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.