Abstract

BackgroundSeveral studies have shown that long-term survival after acute kidney injury (AKI) is reduced even if there is clinical recovery. However, we recently reported that in septic shock patients those that recover from AKI have survival similar to patients without AKI. Here, we studied a cohort with less severe sepsis to examine the effects of AKI on longer-term survival as a function of recovery by discharge.MethodsWe analyzed patients with community-acquired pneumonia from the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) cohort. We included patients who developed AKI (KDIGO stages 2–3) and defined renal recovery as alive at hospital discharge with return of SCr to within 150% of baseline without dialysis. Our primary outcome was survival up to 3 years analyzed using Gray’s model.ResultsOf the 1742 patients who survived to hospital discharge, stage 2–3 AKI occurred in 262 (15%), of which 111 (42.4%) recovered. Compared to recovered patients, patients without recovery were older (75 ±14 vs 69 ±15 years, p<0.001) and were more likely to have at least stage 1 AKI on day 1 (83% vs 52%, p<0.001). Overall, 445 patients (25.5%) died during follow-up, 23.4% (347/1480) for no AKI, 28% (31/111) for AKI with recovery and 44.3% (67/151) for AKI without recovery. Patients who did not recover had worse survival compared to no AKI (HR range 1.05–2.46, p = 0.01), while recovering patients had similar survival compared to no AKI (HR 1.01, 95%CI 0.69–1.47, p = 0.96). Absence of AKI on day 1, no in-hospital renal replacement therapy (RRT), higher Apache III score and higher baseline SCr were associated with recovery after AKI.ConclusionsIn patients with sepsis, recovery by hospital discharge is associated with long-term survival similar to patients without AKI.

Highlights

  • Controversy exists as to whether patients who develop acute kidney injury (AKI) but fully recover renal function have decreased long-term survival and increased risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared to patients who do not develop AKI

  • Patients who did not recover had worse survival compared to no AKI (HR range 1.05–2.46, p = 0.01), while recovering patients had similar survival compared to no AKI (HR 1.01, 95%CI 0.69–1.47, p = 0.96)

  • Recovery by hospital discharge is associated with long-term survival similar to patients without AKI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Controversy exists as to whether patients who develop acute kidney injury (AKI) but fully recover renal function have decreased long-term survival and increased risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared to patients who do not develop AKI. Linder and colleagues found that critically ill patients with one episode of mild AKI (stage 1) have significantly lower 10-year survival rates compared to patients with no AKI [4]. These studies did not examine septic AKI. Patients without recovery have very poor outcomes It is unclear whether sepsis induces a unique AKI phenotype and whether the consequences of recovery are different and more significant even in patients without severe sepsis. We studied a cohort with less severe sepsis to examine the effects of AKI on longer-term survival as a function of recovery by discharge

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call