Abstract

Scale-related assessment strategies are important contributions to successful ecosystem management. With varying impact of environmental drivers from local to regional scales, a focal task is to understand scale-dependent responses when assessing the state of an ecosystem. In this study we use large-scale monitoring data, spanning 40 years and including four aquatic bioindicator groups (phytoplankton, zooplankton, periphyton, zoobenthos) to expose the long-term changes of water quality across Russia. We include four hierarchical spatial scales (region, basin, waterbody and observation point) to identify the relative importance of different spatio-temporal scales for the variation of each bioindicator and patterns of co-variation among the bioindicators at different hierarchical levels. We analysed the data with Hierarchical Modelling of Species Communities (HMSC), an approach that belongs to the framework of joint species distribution models. We performed a cross validation to reveal the predictive power of modelled bioindicator variation, partitioned explained variance among the fixed effects (waterbody type, and influence of human population density) and the random effects (spatial and spatio-temporal variation at the four hierarchical scales), and examined the co-variation among bioindicators at each spatio-temporal scale. We detected generally decreasing water quality across Russian freshwaters, yet with region and bioindicator specific trends. For all bioindicators, the dominating part of the variation was attributed the largest (region) and smallest (observation point) hierarchical scales, the region particularly important for benthic and the observation point for pelagic bioindicators. All bioindicators captured the same spatial variation in water quality at the smallest scale of observation point, with phytoplankton, zooplankton and periphyton being associated positively to each other and negatively to zoobenthos. However, at larger spatial scales and at spatio-temporal scales, the associations among the bioindicators became more complex, with phytoplankton and zooplankton showing opposite trends over time. Our study reveals the sensitivity of bioindicators to spatial and temporal scales. While delivering unidirectional robust water quality assessments at the local scale, bioindicator co-variation is more complex over larger geographic scales and over time.

Highlights

  • Safeguarding good environmental status of aquatic ecosystems is one of the global ecological challenges

  • We analysed the data with Hierarchical Modelling of Species Communities (HMSC; Ovaskainen et al, 2017), an approach that belongs to the class of joint species distribution models (JSDM; Warton et al, 2015)

  • We found the pelagic bioindicators to display high explained variance at the level of observation point, suggesting that they are best in reflecting local conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Safeguarding good environmental status of aquatic ecosystems is one of the global ecological challenges. Manage the integrity of aquatic systems, such as the U.S Clean Water Act or the European Water Framework Directive (WFD), are based on the concept that the state of biological communities reflects the water quality and the impacts they are exposed to (European Comission, 2000; Fore, 2003) The utilisation of such bioindicators is well established and their integration in ecological studies and management tools has tremendously increased in the past decades (Siddig et al, 2016). The mainly stationary and longerlived zoobenthos is permanently exposed to its surrounding conditions and the most frequently used bioindicator group, including diverse taxa with a wide range of tolerances, providing good indications for the current state and longer-term ecosystem changes affecting the benthos It depends on direct effects like eutrophication and on secondary consequences of organic enrichment such as oxygen depletion (Pearson and Rosenberg, 1978; Cairns and Pratt, 1993; Solimini et al, 2006). Considering four hierarchical spatial scales, namely region, water basin, waterbody, and observation point, enables us to disentangle scale-related variation of aquatic ecosystem health over a multi-decadal time frame and add to the understanding of spatial and temporal dependencies among bioindicators

Sampling scheme
Statistical analyses
Variance partitioning
Scale related co-variation among bioindicators
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call