Abstract
The skill of the state-of-the-art ocean circulation models GETM (General Estuarine Transport Model), RCO (Rossby Centre Ocean model), and MOM (Modular Ocean Model) to represent hydrographic conditions and the mean circulation of the Baltic Sea is investigated. The study contains an assessment of vertical temperature and salinity profiles as well as various statistical time series analyses of temperature and salinity for different depths at specific representative monitoring stations. Simulation results for 1970-1999 are compared to observations from the Baltic Environmental Database (BED). Further, we analyze current velocities and volume transports both in the horizontal plane and through three transects in the Baltic Sea. Simulated current velocities are validated against ten years of Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) measurements in the Arkona Basin and five years of mooring observations in the Gotland Basin. Furthermore, the atmospheric forcing datasets, which drive the models, are evaluated using wind measurements from 28 automatic stations along the Swedish coast. We found that the seasonal cycle, variability, and vertical profiles of temperature and salinity are simulated close to observations by RCO with an assimilation setup. All models reproduce temperature well near the sea surface. Salinity simulations are of lower quality from GETM in the northern Baltic Sea and from MOM at various stations. Simulated current velocities lie mainly within the standard deviation of the measurements at the two monitoring stations. However, sea surface currents and transports in the ocean interior are significantly larger in GETM than in the other models. Although simulated hydrographic profiles agree predominantly well with observations, the mean circulation differs considerably between the models highlighting the need for additional long-term current measurements to assess the mean circulation in ocean models. With the help of reanalysis data ocean state estimates of regions and time periods without observations are improved. However, due to the lack of current measurements only the baroclinic velocities of the reanalyses are reliable. A substantial part of the differences in barotropic velocities between the three ocean models and reanalysis data is explained by differences in wind velocities of the atmospheric forcing datasets.
Highlights
Understanding of ocean climate requires, inter alia, knowledge of long-term variability in transports of volume, heat, salt, and matter by highly varying currents
The main conclusions of this study are: 1. Regardless of the chosen vertical coordinate system and horizontal resolution temperature and salinity observations at monitoring stations are reasonably reproduced by state-of-the-art regional ocean circulation models on a 30-year time scale provided that model setup and parameter calibration are correctly done
Both the mean wind-driven and thermohaline circulation differ considerably between the models highlighting the need for additional long-term current measurements to assess the mean circulation in ocean models
Summary
Understanding of ocean climate requires, inter alia, knowledge of long-term variability in transports of volume, heat, salt, and matter by highly varying currents. With an average depth of only 54 m the Baltic Sea is strongly responding to atmospheric influences It is characterized by an intense freshwater supply from the difference between precipitation and evaporation over the sea surface and the inflow from a variety of surrounding rivers. Bergström and Carlsson, 1994) with an error of about ± 600 m3 s−1 (Omstedt and Nohr, 2004) Another significant feature are salt water exchanges with the World Ocean via the North Sea in the west. This leads to a gradient in salinity from west to northeast and strong stratification in the Baltic Sea interior. Precipitation and wind depend on the large-scale atmospheric circulation which is characterized by, e.g., the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and related storm tracks
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.