Abstract

Background: The recanalization success rate of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) can be increased by the retrograde approach. However, the long-term outcome of patients undergoing retrograde procedures is unknown. Aim: We aimed to evaluate the long-term MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event) rate (death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery and stroke) in patients after retrograde versus antegrade CTO-PCI. Methods and results: In a prospective single center study from January 2008 to June 2012, 396 consecutive patients with CTO´s (≥ 3 months old) were enrolled. Mean age was 63.4 ± 10.3 years, 86.4% were male. The recanalization success rate of the total patient cohort was 88.6%. The retrograde PCI, only attempted after a failed antegrade intervention, was performed in 18% (n = 71) of patients. Long-term MACCE rate (mean follow up 2.3 ± 1.6 years) was significantly higher in the unsuccessful compared to the successful CTO-PCI group (23.1% versus 9.4%, p = 0.01) and this was also the case in the subgroup of antegrade CTO-PCI. In the retrograde subgroup, however, procedural success had no impact on outcome. As a possible explanation for this surprising finding, patients with unsuccessful retrograde CTO-PCI had a significantly better collateral connection compared to patients with an unsuccessful antegrade approach. Conclusions: Long-term MACCE rate after unsuccessful recanalization was significantly higher which was driven by a higher MACCE rate after unsuccessful versus successful antegrade approach. In contrast, procedural success in the retrograde group had no impact on outcome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.