Abstract

Esophagectomies are among the most invasive surgical procedures that highly influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recent improvements have helped to achieve longer survival. Therefore, long-term postoperative HRQoL needs to be emphasized in addition to classic criterions like morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare short and long-term HRQoL after open transthoracic esophagectomies (OTEs) and robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (RAMIEs) in patients suffering from esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prospectively collected HRQoL-data (from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)) were correlated with clinical courses. Only patients suffering from minor postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo Classification of < 2) after R0 Ivor-Lewis-procedures were included. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status-score (ASA-score), tumor stage, and perioperative therapy were used for propensity score matching (PSM). Twelve RAMIE and 29 OTE patients met the inclusion criteria. RAMIE patients reported significantly better emotional and social function while suffering from significantly less pain and less physical impairment four months after surgery. The long-term follow up confirmed the results. Long-term postoperative HRQoL and self-perception partly exceeded the levels of the healthy reference population. Minor operative trauma by robotic approaches resulted in significantly reduced physical impairments while improving HRQoL and self-perception, especially in the long-term. However, further long-term results are warranted to confirm this positive trend.

Highlights

  • Esophageal cancer (EC) is, with increasing incidence, becoming among the most common malignancies worldwide [1,2]

  • We aimed to compare short and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after open transthoracic esophagectomies (OTEs) and robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (RAMIEs) in patients suffering from esophageal adenocarcinoma

  • Sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status-score (ASA-score), tumor stage, and perioperative therapy were used for propensity score matching (PSM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Esophageal cancer (EC) is, with increasing incidence, becoming among the most common malignancies worldwide [1,2]. The therapy of choice for locally-resectable EC still is surgery [3,4]. Additional perioperative radio chemotherapy is applied [3,4]. Depending on the localization of the tumor, surgery is performed as a two- or three-cavity approach with an intrathoracic (Ivor-Lewis) or cervical (McKeown) anastomosis, respectively [5,6,7,8]. Since the procedure involves at least two cavities, the surgical approach is important. Perioperative surgical and oncological results, as well as the physical and psychological burden of surgery, highly influence the long-term, postoperative, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), postoperative course, and outcomes [5,9,10,11,12,13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call