Abstract

BackgroundAdults with intellectual disabilities have higher morbidity and earlier mortality than the general population. Access to primary health care is lower, despite a higher prevalence of many long-term conditions.AimTo synthesise the evidence for the management of long-term conditions in adults with intellectual disabilities and identify barriers and facilitators to management in primary care.Design & settingMixed-methods systematic review.MethodSeven electronic databases were searched to identify both quantitative and qualitative studies concerning identification and management of long-term conditions in adults with intellectual disability in primary care. Both the screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, and the quality assessment were carried out in duplicate. Findings were combined in a narrative synthesis.ResultsFifty-two studies were identified. Adults with intellectual disabilities are less likely than the general population to receive screening and health promotion interventions. Annual health checks may improve screening, identification of health needs, and management of long-term conditions. Health checks have been implemented in various primary care contexts, but the long-term impact on outcomes has not been investigated. Qualitative findings highlighted barriers and facilitators to primary care access, communication, and disease management. Accounts of experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities reveal a dilemma between promoting self-care and ensuring access to services, while avoiding paternalistic care.ConclusionAdults with intellectual disabilities face numerous barriers to managing long-term conditions. Reasonable adjustments, based on the experience of adults with intellectual disability, in addition to intervention such as health checks, may improve access and management, but longer-term evaluation of their effectiveness is required.

Highlights

  • People with intellectual disabilities experience higher morbidity and premature mortality than the general population.[1,2] The prevalence of multiple long-term conditions is higher, reflecting a combination of factors including genetic and biological associations with specific causes of intellectual disabilities,[3,4] and greater exposure to environmental and social risk factors.[5]

  • A pre-post analysis of a one-to-one counselling intervention with women with intellectual disabilities showed a modest increase in uptake

  • Two randomised controlled trials of health checks showed an improvement in cervical smear uptake.[31,32]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People with intellectual disabilities experience higher morbidity and premature mortality than the general population.[1,2] The prevalence of multiple long-term conditions is higher, reflecting a combination of factors including genetic and biological associations with specific causes of intellectual disabilities,[3,4] and greater exposure to environmental and social risk factors.[5] Access to health services, screening, and health promotion is lower among people with intellectual disabilities,[6,7] and health needs are often unrecognised or unmet.[8] A confidential inquiry into deaths of people with intellectual disabilities in England concluded that 37% were potentially avoidable through better provision of health care.[2] Another study reported the same rate and, in comparison with the general population, reported a hazard ratio for deaths amenable to care of 5.86 (95% confidence intervals [CI] = 5.06 to 6.80). Reasonable adjustments, based on the experience of adults with intellectual disability, in addition to intervention such as health checks, may improve access and management, but longer-term evaluation of their effectiveness is required

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call