Abstract

BackgroundThe short-term efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) has been established in femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. The aim of this study was to compare 5-year clinical outcomes of patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with and without PCB.MethodsAfter 1:1 propensity score matching, we extracted 50 patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing PTA with (n = 25) and without (n = 25) IN.PACT PCB (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) from 106 consecutive ISR patients treated in our hospital between 2009 and 2015. We compared the 5-year outcomes between PCB and non-PCB groups. The primary endpoint was the cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent restenosis. All-cause mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and unplanned major amputation were also assessed.ResultsThe primary patency after PCB treatment at 5 years was significantly higher than the patency after non-PCB treatment (65.7% vs. 18.7%; hazard ratio [HR]: 6.11; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.57–16.82; p < 0.001), as well as freedom from TLR (77.6% vs. 53.8%; HR: 3.55; 95% CI: 1.21–12.83; p = 0.020). All-cause mortality and unplanned major amputation rates did not significantly differ between the two groups. The Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis showed that PCB was independently associated with preventing recurrent restenosis (HR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.06–0.41; p < 0.001).ConclusionsAt 5 years, patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing PCB treatment showed significantly lower recurrent restenosis than those that underwent non-PCB treatment.Evidence-based medicineLevel of Evidence: Level 2b, Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

Highlights

  • Endovascular therapy (EVT) represents an established practice in the treatment of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD)

  • Before propensity score (PS) matching, no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics were observed between paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) and non-PCB groups, except for in-stent restenosis (ISR) patterns

  • Before and after PS matching, the balloon sizes and pressure before PCB dilatation were similar between the two groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endovascular therapy (EVT) represents an established practice in the treatment of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The one-year efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) has been proven in treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) after BNS implantation by (2021) 4:13 randomized control trials (RCT) comparing to plain balloon angioplasty; PCB is one of the best solutions for ISR lesions (Krankenberg et al, 2015; Kinstner et al, 2016; Ott et al, 2017; Cassese et al, 2018). We retrospectively compared the 5-year clinical outcomes of patients with femoropopliteal ISR undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with and without PCB. The short-term efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) has been established in femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. The aim of this study was to compare 5-year clinical outcomes of patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with and without PCB

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call