Abstract

SummaryBackgroundAntithrombotic (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) therapy is withheld from some patients with cerebral cavernous malformations, because of uncertainty around the safety of these drugs in such patients. We aimed to establish whether antithrombotic therapy is associated with an increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage in adults with cerebral cavernous malformations.MethodsIn this population-based, cohort study, we used data from the Scottish Audit of Intracranial Vascular Malformations, which prospectively identified individuals aged 16 years and older living in Scotland who were first diagnosed with a cerebral cavernous malformation during 1999–2003 or 2006–10. We compared the association between use of antithrombotic therapy after first presentation and the occurrence of intracranial haemorrhage or persistent or progressive focal neurological deficit due to the cerebral cavernous malformations during up to 15 years of prospective follow-up with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed in all individuals identified in the database. We also did a systematic review and meta-analysis, in which we searched Ovid MEDLINE and Embase from database inception to Feb 1, 2019, to identify comparative studies to calculate the intracranial haemorrhage incidence rate ratio according to antithrombotic therapy use. We then generated a pooled estimate using the inverse variance method and a random effects model.FindingsWe assessed 300 of 306 individuals with a cerebral cavernous malformation who were eligible for study. 61 used antithrombotic therapy (ten [16%] of 61 used anticoagulation) for a mean duration of 7·4 years (SD 5·4) during follow-up. Antithrombotic therapy use was associated with a lower risk of subsequent intracranial haemorrhage or focal neurological deficit (one [2%] of 61 vs 29 [12%] of 239, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·12, 95% CI 0·02–0·88; p=0·037). In a meta-analysis of six cohort studies including 1342 patients, antithrombotic therapy use was associated with a lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage (eight [3%] of 253 vs 152 [14%] of 1089; incidence rate ratio 0·25, 95% CI 0·13–0·51; p<0·0001; I2=0%).InterpretationAntithrombotic therapy use is associated with a lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage or focal neurological deficit from cerebral cavernous malformations than avoidance of antithrombotic therapy. These findings provide reassurance about safety for clinical practice and require further investigation in a randomised controlled trial.FundingUK Medical Research Council, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government, The Stroke Association, Cavernoma Alliance UK, and the Remmert Adriaan Laan Foundation.

Highlights

  • Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are the second com­monest incidental vascular finding on brain MRI.[1]

  • Few data are available on the effect of antithrombotic therapy on the risk of intracranial haemor­rhage in adults with a CCM, leaving it diffi­cult to create guidelines with strong recommendations,[8] despite expert opinion that anticoagulation is contraindi­ cated in patients with CCMs on the basis of a case report.[9]

  • Added value of this study To our knowledge, this is the first prospective, population-based study investigating this question, in which we found an association between antithrombotic therapy use and a lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage or focal neurological deficit due to a CCM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are the second com­monest incidental vascular finding on brain MRI.[1] CCMs can cause stroke due to either intracranial haemor­rhage or non-haemorrhagic focal neurological deficit attributable to the anatomical locat­ion of the CCM.[2] The risk of these strokes is higher for people with CCMs that have already caused an intracranial haemorrhage and for those with a brainstem CCM.[3]. Few data are available on the effect of antithrombotic therapy on the risk of intracranial haemor­rhage in adults with a CCM, leaving it diffi­cult to create guidelines with strong recommendations,[8] despite expert opinion that anticoagulation is contraindi­ cated in patients with CCMs on the basis of a case report.[9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call