Abstract

Increasing information can make actions more effective, thereby improving cooperation levels. However, this assumption lacks experimental support in the case of long-range migration, and the potential mechanism for higher cooperation rates resulting from inter-group migration is not yet clear. Therefore, we mainly studied the impact of four different information levels on group cooperation behavior from an experimental perspective through public goods game experiments in the context of long-range migration. The results indicate that the amount of information can significantly affect individual mobility and cooperation evolution. Defection prevails among players in the absence of information, leading to the formation of a stable cluster of defectors. However, with increased information about profit calculation rules, players tend to settle in favorable cooperative groups. Increased information about the decisions of other players speeds up the formation of stable cooperative groups. Excessive information disclosure about payoffs leads to increased mobility and reduced cooperation among group members. These findings provide insights into our understanding of the evolution history of human cooperation and the formation of groups.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.