Abstract

Long‐lived, large scale segmentation of the mid‐ocean ridge, as defined by variations in subsidence rate of the ocean crust, zero‐age depth, and geoid rate, has been documented along three mid‐ocean ridge systems: the South Atlantic, the Pacific‐Antarctic, and the Southeast Indian. Many of the observations in these three areas are inconsistent with standard thermal models for the generation of oceanic crust and lithosphere. Three models for subsidence rate and geoid rate and two models for zero‐age depth are examined. Sensitivity tests are done to determine how much the thermal and physical “constants” in these models must vary in order to explain the observations and whether or not such values are plausible. Only the zero‐age depth variations can be adequately explained using existing models. An internally consistent, qualitative model is presented which can explain the data; it involves regional and local temperature changes in the mantle both along and across strike of the mid‐ocean ridge.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.