Abstract

The seismic response of continuously welded track on bridges is seeing increased interest. Taking the railway deck arch bridge as an example, a track–bridge spatial coupling finite element model was established, and the effects of arch rib temperature difference and bridge span layout on rail seismic force were analyzed. The results show that the peak rail seismic force is larger than the maximum expansion force, and thus track constraints should be taken into consideration in railway arch bridge seismic design. The area enclosed by the hysteresis curve of track resistance increases gradually with an increase in dynamic displacement, and under seismic loading the track constraints can be considered to be in a relatively stable state of energy dissipation. The rail seismic forces under different waves varied greatly, so a wave whose spectrum characteristics fit the bridge site well should be used. The beam temperature difference can affect the structural seismic response, but this effect can be ignored when only considering the maximum rail seismic force. With the application of a series of three continuous beams on the arch and the reasonable arrangement of fixed bearings and speed locks, the track longitudinal stress deformation during an earthquake outperforms that of supported beams.

Highlights

  • The technology developed for continuous welded rail (CWR) on bridges is one of the core technologies in modern railway tracks, providing support for high-speed and heavy load railway transportation [1,2,3]

  • This paper presents the seismic response of CWR on arch bridges

  • The major results can be summarized as follows: summarized as follows: (1) Track constraints need to be considered in seismic calculations, or structural seismic response

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The technology developed for continuous welded rail (CWR) on bridges is one of the core technologies in modern railway tracks, providing support for high-speed and heavy load railway transportation [1,2,3]. The seismic responses of continuously welded ballasted track on bridges through the shaking table test were conducted, and the results indicated that track constraint can improve the low order natural frequency of bridges significantly, and reduce the displacement response [10]. Published research reveals that the stress deformation mechanism of CWR track on large-span arch bridges is complex and quite different from that of supported beam bridges and continuous beam bridges. Previous work on track–bridge interaction under uniform seismic excitation mainly focuses on the seismic response of supported beam bridges and continuous beam bridges. It fails to fully account for the seismic response of CWR track on large-span arch bridges. The effect of seismic excitations, thermal changes, bridge span layout, and changes to other parameters were compared

Calculation Model for CWR Seismic Response on Deck Arch Bridges
Numerical Model
Bridge
Selection
Influence of Track Constraints on Arch Bridge Seismic Response
Comparison
Longitudinal
Comparison of Pier
Dynamic
Hysteresis
Seismic Wave Spectrum
design of earthquake
Rib Temperature
Bridge Span Layout
15. Maximum
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call