Abstract

Geometry and mass of an aircraft are important factors in flight mechanics and in the calculations of stability and natural frequencies of its flight modes, which are of great importance in controller design process. In this paper, comparison between the formulae of the large aircraft applied on small UAVs scale, XFLR5 as a numerical program and experimental data obtained from flight tests is made to investigate their accuracy. A method to validate natural frequencies for UAVs is presented. It is found that for the phugoid mode, methods of Roskam (exact), Ostoslavsky, and XFLR5 estimate the frequency within range of the experimental results while the methods of Roskam (approximation) and Hull overestimate it and should not be applied in case of small UAVs. Considering the short-period mode, all methods can predict the actual frequency with acceptable accuracy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.