Longitudinal changes in ventricular size and function are associated with death and transplantation late after the Fontan operation

Abstract

BackgroundCross-sectional studies have reported that ventricular dilation and dysfunction are associated with adverse clinical outcome in Fontan patients; however, longitudinal changes and their relationship with outcome are not known.MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective analysis of Fontan patients with at least 2 cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scans without intervening interventions. Serial measures of end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), ejection fraction (EF), indexed mass (massi), mass-to-volume ratio, and end-systolic wall stress (ESWS) were used to estimate within-patient change over time. Changes were compared for those with and without a composite outcome (death, heart transplant, or transplant listing) as well as between patients with left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) dominance.ResultsData from 156 patients were analyzed with a mean age at 1st CMR of 17.8 ± 9.6 years. 490 CMRs were included with median of 3 CMRs/patient (range 2–9). On regression analysis with mixed effects models, volumes and ESWS increased, while mass, mass-to-volume ratio, and EF decreased over time. With a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 14% met the composite outcome. Those with the composite outcome had a greater increase in EDVI compared to those without (4.7 vs. 0.8 ml/BSA1.3/year). Compared with LV dominance, RV dominance was associated with a greater increase in ESVI (1.4 vs. 0.5 ml/BSA1.3/year), a greater decrease in EF (− 0.61%/year vs. − 0.24%/year), and a higher rate of the composite outcome (21% vs. 8%).ConclusionsVentricles in the Fontan circulation exhibit a steady decline in performance with an increase in EDVI, ESVI, and ESWS, and decrease in EF, mass index, and mass-to-volume ratio. Those with death or need for heart transplantation have a faster increase in EDVI. Patients with rapid increase in EDVI (> 5 ml/BSA1.3/year) may be at a higher risk of adverse outcomes and may benefit from closer surveillance. RV dominance is associated with worse clinical outcomes and remodeling compared to LV dominance.