Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the relationship between the cost of health care and the aging of the population assisted by a self-managed plan, reflecting on the ways to address the challenge arising from this conjunction of population demographic changes. This is a descriptive study of the 1997-2016 period based on secondary data from the management operator of the health plan under study and from another administrative database of a self-managing provider with broad nationwide coverage. Older adults (over 60 years) increased 55% during the study period. On the other hand, the so-called "very old" (over 80 years) grew 332.8%. The population above 60 years corresponds to 25.7% of the total, and accounts for 68.8% of expenses. Most of the population covered (84,6%) is located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, which has the highest per capita health care cost in Brazil. We found a relationship between aging of the beneficiary population and increased expenditure. It is imperative to invest in health promotion and disease prevention initiatives as a way of improving the quality of life and financial sustainability of the plan, and define a subsystem that delimits and regulates access to the network and is accepted by the beneficiaries.

Highlights

  • In Brazil, the Unified Health System (SUS), a public system with universal coverage, is the only care alternative for more than 75% of the population[1,2]

  • This paper aims to analyze the relationship between the cost of health care and the aging of the population assisted by a self-managed plan, reflecting on the ways to address the challenge arising from this conjunction of population demographic changes

  • There is a large concentration of study population in the State of Rio de Janeiro (84.6%), with 78.4% in Grande Rio, home of the self-management operator

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Brazil, the Unified Health System (SUS), a public system with universal coverage, is the only care alternative for more than 75% of the population[1,2]. The National Supplementary Health Agency (ANS) is responsible for the regulation and supervision of this sector, and classifies operators regarding their legal status in: Self-management; Medical cooperative; Philanthropy; Group medicine; and Health insurance company[3]. With the possibility of beneficiaries participating in management, is one of them. Another important differential is that they are non-economic associations. Because they are non-profit, they do not pay commissions to brokers and do not spend resources on sales marketing and commercial structure, self-management operators are notable for providing the best cost-coverage ratio[3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call