Abstract
AbstractWe revisit the question of whether high levels of non‐audit fees degrade audit quality. We use a structural model to specify the key variables and a grouping approach to reduce measurement error and tighten identification of the non‐audit fee threat to audit quality. We use going concern opinions (GCOs) and financial restatements to proxy for audit quality. We find that higher non‐audit fees reduce the percentage of GCOs issued around the passage of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), and that restatements are higher around SOX also. The trends in the GCO and restatement percentages after SOX are consistent with an improvement in audit quality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.