Abstract

Both CO2 transoral laser microsurgery (CO2 TOLMS) and radiotherapy (RT) are standard of care in early glottic carcinoma. However, previous studies focus on voice outcomes rather than swallowing outcomes. This study aimed to compare the late post-treatment effects of CO2 TOLMS and RT treatment on swallowing function in T1 glottic carcinoma. Forty patients (20 CO2 TOLMS and 20 RT) with T1 glottic cancer between May 2015 and January 2019 were included. Certain types of foods triggering dysphagia, any difficulties in bolus control, need to clean the throat, the sensation of lumping in the throat, choking, cough and xerostomia were questioned. Also, functional oral intake scale (FOIS), functional outcome swallowing scale (FOSS), Eating Assessment Tool-10 test (EAT-10) and flexible fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) findings were assessed. CO2 TOLMS patients performed significantly better than the RT group regarding penetration and aspiration with 10 and 20mL water according to the Penetration and Aspiration Scale (P<.05). The mean EAT-10 Score was found 0 in the CO2 TOLMS group, and 3.20±3.24 in the RT group (P<.05) (lower score indicates a better outcome). According to the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Scale for vallecula, there was no statistically significant difference in vallecular residue between the groups (P>.05). A significantly lesser residue in piriform sinus was detected in the CO2 TOLMS group compared to the RT group with 5mL and 10mL water, 5mL and 20mL honey consistency food and yogurt according to Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Scale (P<.05). It is suggested that in the long term, CO2 TOLMS is more advantageous regarding swallowing function in the treatment of T1 glottic cancer.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.