Abstract

The presented study aimed to assess the survival rate of porcelain laminate veneers (PLV) based on a systematic review of the literature. An electronic search was last updated in February 2021. Eligibility criteria included clinical series of patients rehabilitated with PLVs published in the last 25 years, with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Survival analysis methods were applied. Twenty-five studies were included, with 6500 PLVs. The 10-year estimated cumulative survival rate (CSR) of PLVs was 95.5%. The 10-year CSR of PLVs when fracture, debonding, occurrence of secondary caries, and need of endodontic treatment were considered as isolated reasons for failure were 96.3%, 99.2%, 99.3%, and 99.0%, respectively. PLVs without incisal coverage had a higher failure rate than PLVs with incisal coverage. Non-feldspathic PLVs performed better than feldspathic PLVs. As a conclusion, the 10-year CSR of PLVs was 95.5%, when fracture, debonding, occurrence of secondary caries, and need of endodontic treatment were considered as reasons for restoration failure. Fracture seems to be most common complication of PLVs, followed by debonding, with both more commonly happening within the first years after PLV cementation. PLVs with incisal coverage and non-feldspathic PLVs presented lower failure rates than PLVs without incisal coverage and feldspathic PLVs.

Highlights

  • Teeth in the esthetic zone have an important role in the general appearance of a person’s smile

  • The search strategy in the databases resulted in 2192 papers

  • The reviewers independently screened the abstracts for those articles related to the aim of the review

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Teeth in the esthetic zone have an important role in the general appearance of a person’s smile. Any defect in these teeth related to color, shape, or alignment could lead to a negative impact on the smile aesthetics. The most common reasons that lead to such defects include caries lesions, failed old restorations, and trauma [1]. Restorations based on direct filling materials offer a quick and cheap treatment option for many patients. These direct fillings have limitations, such as long-term discoloration in addition to the high risk of recurrent caries [2]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call