Abstract

Coastal regions around the globe represent a major source for anthropogenic aerosols in the atmosphere, but the surface characteristics may not be optimal for the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) algorithms designed for aerosol retrievals over dark land or ocean surfaces. Using data collected from 62 coastal stations worldwide by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) in 2002–2011, statistical assessments of uncertainties are conducted for coastal aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrieved from MODIS measurements aboard the Aqua satellite (i.e., the Collection 5.1 MYD04 data product generated by the MODIS atmosphere group). It is found that coastal AODs (at 550 nm) characterised respectively by the Dark Land algorithm and the Dark Ocean algorithm all exhibit a log-normal distribution, which contrasts to the near-normal distribution of their corresponding biases. After data filtering using quality flags, the MODIS AODs from both the Dark Land and Dark Ocean algorithms over coastal regions are highly correlated with AERONET AODs (R2≈0.8), but both have larger uncertainties than their counterparts (of MODIS AODs) over land and open ocean. Overall, the Dark Ocean algorithm overestimates the AERONET coastal AOD by 0.021 for AOD < 0.25 and underestimates it by 0.029 for AOD > 0.25. This dichotomy is shown to be related to the ocean-surface wind speed and cloud-contamination effects on the MODIS aerosol retrievals. Consequently, an empirical correction scheme is formulated that uses cloud fraction and sea-surface wind speed from Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) to correct the AOD bias from the Dark Ocean algorithm, and it is shown to be effective over the majority of the coastal AERONET stations to (a) simultaneously reduce both the mean and the spread of the bias and (b) improve the trend analysis of AOD. Further correlation analysis performed after such an empirical bias correction shows that the MODIS AOD is also likely impacted by the concentration of suspended particulate matter in coastal waters, which is not taken into account during the MODIS AOD retrievals. While mathematically the MODIS AODs over the global coastal AERONET sites show statistically significant discrepancies (p<1%) from their respective AERONET-measured counterparts in terms of mean and frequency, different applications of MODIS AODs in climate and air-quality studies often have their own tolerances of uncertainties. Nevertheless, it is recommended that an improved treatment of varying sea-surface wind and sediment over coastal waters be an integral part in the continuous evolution of the MODIS AOD retrieval algorithms.

Highlights

  • This study focuses on the characterisation of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol optical depth (AOD) uncertainty over the coastal regions because: (a) The MODIS AOD product over the coastal region is a simple union of the retrievals from algorithms that are designed for either over land only or over open ocean only, and neither algorithm has a dedicated scheme to characterise the surface reflectance over the coastal region that is often influenced by a sandÁwater mixture and water reflectance contributed by the underlying sea shore and suspended matter in the coastal ocean; (b) the coastal region is often of high importance to its local economic development through either tourism or serving as a hub for freight transportation (Tibbetts, 2002)

  • By including the Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) wind speed at approximately the time of each MODIS AOD retrieval, the MODIS AOD bias is estimated from regression equation, tbias 00.010vÁ0.024 found in Section 4.2 and is subsequently subtracted from the corresponding AOD to create an empirically corrected AOD

  • Aqua-MODIS AOD products retrieved during Â9 yr are evaluated using spatially and temporally collocated Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) AOD data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aerosols play an important role in the Earth’s energy balance and hydrological cycle (Charlson et al, 1992) through scattering and absorbing radiation (direct affect), as well as by influencing cloud radiative effects through the modification of their microphysical properties in the. The estimate of the EE envelope is based upon the MODIS-AERONET AOD comparison over the whole globe It does not reflect variation of retrieval uncertainties due to the change of land surface type and atmospheric conditions (Hyer et al, 2011) nor does it contain any information related to the mean and the spread of the AOD biases (i.e. probability density function (PDF) of bias; Li et al, 2007). An overview of the data products used for this research is provided in the first part of this section, including the MODIS aerosol algorithms and AOD product, AERONET aerosol measurements, sea-surface wind speed, and MODISnormalised water-leaving radiance datasets retrieved from the MODIS Ocean Color algorithm This is followed by the discussion of the processes used for collocating MODIS and AERONET AOD

MODIS and AERONET AOD products
Sea-surface wind speed data
MODIS-AERONET collocation and coastal site classification
Metrics for comparing MODIS and AERONET AOD
Cloud impact
Wind speed impact
Bias correction for wind speed and clouds
Impact of sediments on the residual bias
The impact of empirical corrections on AOD trend analysis
Findings
Conclusions and discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call