Abstract
Purpose We compared our experience with self-contained inflatable and multicomponent prostheses during similar intervals. Materials and Methods We followed 295 patients with self-contained prostheses and 1,026 with multicomponent inflatable devices for up to 8 years. Revision rates for mechanical failure, infection or patient dissatisfaction were statistically analyzed. Results Multicomponent inflatable prostheses were superior with regard to mechanical reliability and patient satisfaction, with no difference in rate of infection. Self-contained prostheses were best replaced with the AMS 700CX* device, thus avoiding aneurysm. *American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minnesota. Conclusions Self-contained inflatable prostheses may be of limited value for the treatment of impotence. The AMS 700CX is the device of choice for replacement of explanted self-contained prostheses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
