Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor of lumbar spine surgical failure. The interest of anterior lumbar fusion in this context remains unknown. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcome of anterior-only fusions between RA patients and non-RA (NRA) patients to treat lumbar spine degenerative disorders. NRA and RA groups including anterior-only fusion were compared. Clinical data (Visual Analog Scale score axial back pain scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, and a questionnaire of satisfaction regarding the surgical result); radiologic data (bone fusion, sagittal balance analysis); and adverse events were assessed using repeated measure 1-way analysis of variance. The mean follow-up was 9.5 years (95% confidence interval [7.1-12.2]) for the RA group (n= 13) and 9.4 years (95% confidence interval [8.7-10.3]) for the NRA group (n= 36). Anterior fusion improved clinical outcome without any effect of RA (Visual Analog Scale score axial back pain scale; P < 0.001/Oswestry Disability Index; P= 0.01). The presence of RA influenced neither the satisfaction as the regards the surgical result nor spine balance nor bone fusion. Context of RA increased the surgical revision rate (10 patients [76.9%] for RA group vs. 3 patients [8.8%] for the NRA group; P= 0.001) because of the occurrence of an adjacent segment disease needing surgical revision (P= 0.028), especially the occurrence of intervertebral frontal dislocation (P= 0.02). As noticed for posterior-only fusion, the anterior lumbar approach in RA patients does not seem to avoid the occurrence of an adjacent segment disease.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.