Long-term recurrence rate and survival in different aged patients with breast cancer undergoing breast conserving therapy

Abstract

Objective: To examine the difference of long-term recurrence rate and survivals between the young patients and the old patients undergoing breast conserving therapy (BCT). Methods: Women with primary invasive breast cancer receiving BCT between December 1999 and December 2014 were selected retrospectively from the database of Breast Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute. The median age of all patients was 47 years (range: 21 to 91 years). The cases were categorized according to age at diagnosis into two subgroups: the ≤40 years group and the>40 years group. A total of 2 778 patients were included: 677 patients in the ≤40 years group and 2 101 patients in the >40 years group. Clinicopathological characteristics between two groups were compared. The recurrence rate and survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The differences of outcomes were compared in different aged groups using the Log-rank test. Factors affecting local recurrence, distant disease-free survival (DDFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Proportions of T1 (301/677 vs. 1 160/2 101, χ²=37.660, P<0.01), involved lymph node (314/677 vs. 713/2 101, χ²=34.966, P<0.01) hormone receptor-negative (490/677 vs. 1 581/2 101, χ²=6.981, P=0.030) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (413/677 vs. 1 010/2 101, χ²=34.272,P<0.01)in the ≤40 years group were higher than that in the>40 years group. Median follow-up duration was 102 months. No significant difference in 10-year local recurrence was found between the two groups (2.5% vs. 1.6%, P=0.147). Ten-year DDFS rate in the ≤40 years group and in the>40 years group was 90.6% and 95.3%, respectively (P<0.01). Ten-year DFS rate in the ≤40 years group and in the>40 years group was 86.5% and 91.1%, respectively (P=0.001). Ten-year BCSS rate in the ≤40 years group and in the >40 years group was 91.0% and 93.7%, respectively (P=0.105). Age was not the prognosis factor of local recurrence. Lymph node status (positive vs. negative: HR=2.73, 95%CI: 1.94 to 3.84, P<0.01), age (≤40 years vs.>40 years: HR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.24 to 2.42, P=0.001) and T stage (>2 cm vs. ≤2 cm: HR=1.61, 95%CI: 1.14 to 2.28, P=0.001) were the prognosis factors of DDFS, and also for DFS. Hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative: HR=0.54, 95%CI: 0.39 to 0.74, P<0.01), lymph node status (positive vs. negative: HR=2.94, 95%CI: 2.12 to 4.07, P<0.01) and T stage (>2 cm vs. ≤2 cm: HR=1.45, 95%CI: 1.05 to 2.01, P=0.025) were the prognosis factors of BCSS. Conclusions: The risk of local recurrence was similar between ≤40 years patient and >40 years patients receiving breast conserving therapy. Worse survivals in the ≤40 years group were found comparing to those in the >40 years group.