Long-Term Redetachment Rates of Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Retinal Detachment: A PIVOT Post Hoc Analysis

Abstract

PurposeTo assess long-term re-detachment rates of the Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT). DesignRandomized controlled trial. SubjectsPIVOT trial participants MethodsThis study was performed at St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada. PIVOT trial participants, with a minimum follow-up of two years, who had undergone either pneumatic retinopexy or ppv for rrd repair were assessed for long-term re-detachment by chart review or telephone interview. The latter was the only accepted method for those with less than two years of follow-up. Patients were only eligible if no re-intervention to reattach the retina was performed within the first year of the initial procedure. Main Outcome MeasuresLong-term re-detachment rates for pneumatic retinopexy versus ppv following RRD repair. Results61 ppv participants and 62 pneumatic retinopexy participants were analyzed. The long-term re-detachment rate was 0% and 1.61% (1/62) in the ppv and pneumatic retinopexy groups, respectively (p= 0.32). The mean follow-up duration in years was 5.43+/-3.60 versus 5.51+/-3.03 in the ppv and pnr groups, respectively. ConclusionThere was no statistically significant difference in long-term re-detachment rates for pneumatic retinopexy vs ppv. Both procedures are durable treatment options for rrd over an extended period, rarely requiring additional intervention for re-detachment.