Long-term prophylaxis in hereditary angioedema management: Current practices in France and unmet needs.

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by unpredictable and potentially life-threatening attacks of cutaneous and submucosal swelling. Over the past decade, new agents, based on a better understanding of the underlying biologic mechanisms of HAE, have changed the face of long-term prophylaxis (LTP). Objective: The objective was to describe current practices and unmet needs with regard to LTP for HAE in expert centers in France. Methods: The study was conducted in France in 2020. Based on their experience with patients with HAE who had visited their center at least once in the past 3 years, physicians from 25 centers who are expert in the management of HAE were requested to fill in a questionnaire that encapsulated their active patient list, criteria for prescribing LTP, and medications used. They were asked about potential unmet needs with currently available therapies. They were asked to express their expectations with regard to the future of HAE management. Results: Analysis was restricted to 20 centers that had an active patient file and agreed to participate. There were 714 patients with C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency, of whom 423 (59.2%) were treated with LTP. Altered quality of life triggered the decision to start LTP, as did the frequency and severity of attacks. Ongoing LTP included androgens (28.4%), progestins (25.8%), lanadelumab (25.3%), tranexamic acid (14.2%), intravenous C1-INHs (5.6%), and recombinant C1-INH (0.7%). Twenty-nine percent of the patents with LTP were considered to still have unmet needs. Physicians' concerns varied among therapies: poor tolerability for androgens and progestins, a lack of efficacy for tranexamic acid and progestins, dosage form, and high costs for C1-INHs and lanadelumab. Physicians' expectations encompassed more-efficacious and better-tolerated medications, easier treatment administration for the sake of improved quality of life of patients, and less-expensive therapies. Conclusion: Despite the recent enrichment of the therapeutic armamentarium for LTP, physicians still expressed unmet needs with currently available therapies.

Similar Papers
  • Front Matter
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.026
Hereditary angioedema: An orphan but an original disease?
  • Aug 5, 2021
  • The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • Werner Aberer

Hereditary angioedema: An orphan but an original disease?

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 12
  • 10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000100
Management of hereditary angioedema in resource-constrained settings: A consensus statement from Indian subcontinent.
  • Jun 1, 2023
  • Asia Pacific Allergy
  • Ankur Kumar Jindal + 18 more

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an uncommon disorder characterized clinically by recurrent episodes of nonitchy subcutaneous and/or submucosal swellings. The estimated prevalence of HAE is ~ 1: 10,000 to 1: 50,000. There are no prevalence data from India, however, estimates suggest that there are 27,000 to 135,000 patients with HAE in India at present. The majority of these, however, remain undiagnosed. Replacement of plasma-derived or recombinant C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) protein, administered intravenously, is the treatment of choice during the management of acute episodes of angioedema (i.e., "on-demand treatment") and is also useful for short-term prophylaxis (STP) and long-term prophylaxis (LTP). This has been found to be effective and safe even in young children and during pregnancy. Until recently, none of the first-line treatment options were available for "on-demand treatment," STP or LTP in India. As a result, physicians had to use fresh frozen plasma for both "on-demand treatment" and STP. For LTP, attenuated androgens (danazol or stanozolol) and/or tranexamic acid were commonly used. These drugs have been reported to be useful for LTP but are associated with a significant risk of adverse effects. Intravenous pd-C1-INH, the first-line treatment option, is now available in India. However, because there is no universal health insurance, access to pd-C1-INH is a significant challenge. HAE Society of India has developed these consensus guidelines for India and other resource-constrained settings where plasma-derived C1-INH therapy is the only available first-line treatment option for the management of HAE and diagnostic facilities are limited. These guidelines have been developed because it may not be possible for all patients to access the recommended therapy and at the recommended doses as suggested by the international guidelines. Moreover, it may not be feasible to follow the evaluation algorithm suggested by the international guidelines.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 13
  • 10.1002/clt2.12092
Reviewing clinical considerations and guideline recommendations of C1 inhibitor prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema.
  • Jan 1, 2022
  • Clinical and Translational Allergy
  • John Anderson + 1 more

BackgroundHereditary angioedema (HAE), a rare disease that is characterized by painful and recurring non‐allergic swelling episodes, is caused by the deficiency or dysfunction of C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein. A comprehensive HAE management plan may require long‐term prophylaxis (LTP) in addition to on‐demand treatment to help “normalize” patients' lives so that they may fully engage in work, school, family, and leisure activities.AimThe main objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of updated guideline recommendations specific to LTP of HAE and discuss clinical considerations and pharmacologic management options, with a focus on C1INH.Materials and MethodsThe authors reviewed relevant HAE literature for current recommendations regarding LTP and the role of C1NH.ResultsAcute HAE attacks are treated with on‐demand medication; however, there is a consensus that LTP should routinely be considered for risk reduction and prevention of future episodes. The 2017 World Allergy Organization/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines recommend that all patients with HAE be evaluated for LTP routinely and the 2020 HAE Association (HAEA) guidelines emphasize that the decision to use LTP should not be based on rigid criteria, but rather should be based on individual patient needs. Both guidelines recommend C1INH as first‐line/preferred therapy for LTP in a range of patient types including adults, children/adolescents, and pregnant/lactating patients. The HAEA also recommends the kallikrein inhibitor, lanadelumab, as a first‐line option for LTP. HAE pathway‐specific agents for LTP have not been associated with notable safety concerns.DiscussionPlasma‐derived C1INH has been available for 40+ years in Europe and impacts multiple targets within the HAE pathway. C1INH has been used for on‐demand treatment and LTP. A subcutaneous formulation of plasma‐derived C1INH is approved for LTP and produces functional C1INH activity levels consistently above the threshold needed for protection from HAE attacks. Other pathway‐specific options for LTP include the plasma kallikrein inhibitors, lanadelumab‐flyo and berotralstat, approved for adults and pediatric patients aged ≥12 years. C1INH is approved for adults and pediatric patients aged ≥6 years.ConclusionAssessing the need for LTP is vital in the ongoing dialogue between clinicians and patients, as both disease‐related factors and patient preferences may change over time. Among available options for LTP, plasma‐derived C1INH is the broadly recommended first‐line option for LTP in patients with HAE, including pregnant/lactating women and pediatric patients (≥6 years).

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 49
  • 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00047
C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency, airway compromise, and anesthesia.
  • Aug 1, 1998
  • Anesthesia and analgesia
  • Niels F Jensen + 1 more

C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency, airway compromise, and anesthesia.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.15789/1563-0625-slp-2062
Successful long-term prophylaxis of hereditary pregnancy-associated angioedema with plasma-derived C1-inhibitor concentrate: a case report
  • Jan 10, 2021
  • Medical Immunology (Russia)
  • Darya V Demina + 4 more

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disease caused by quantitative (type I) or functional (type II) deficiency in C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH). It may be caused by new mutations in up to 20% of patients. Prevalence of HAE is uncertain but is estimated to be approximately 1 case per 50,000 persons, without known differences among ethnic groups. C1-INH protein is a serine protease inhibitor that is important in controlling vascular permeability by acting on the initial phase of the complement activation, blood clotting, and fibrinolysis. Deficiency in functional C1-INH protein permits release of bradykinin, a key mediator of vascular permeability. Symptoms typically begin since childhood, worsening at puberty, and persist throughout the life, with unpredictable clinical course. The patients with HAE suffer from recurrent, acute attacks of edema that can affect any body sites, causing potentially life-threatening disorders (laryngeal edema). Results of clinical studies show that minor traumas, stress and medical interventions may be frequent precipitants of swelling episodes, but many attacks occur without an apparent cause. Pregnancy-associated hormonal changes may affect the course of C1-INH angioedema attacks by worsening, improving, or having no impact at all, but a higher percentage of pregnant women experienced an increase in C1-INH-HAE attack rates. Therapeutic options for patients with HAE are limited during pregnancy. C1-INH concentrate is recommended as the first-line therapy for pregnant women with HAE for on-demand treatment, shortterm and long-term prophylaxis, due to its safety and efficiency. Other therapies, e.g., treatment with fresh frozen plasma, androgens, icatibant, antifibrinolytics, may show variable efficacy, or cause undesirable side effects. The case below illustrates the successful treatment of HAE in a pregnant woman with C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate. This patient had a very mild course of HAE during her lifetime and didn’t get any treatment. During pregnancy, she experienced a significant increase in the frequency of attacks, and the decision was made to start replacement therapy with a plasma-derived, double virus-inactivated C1-INH concentrate as a long-term prophylaxis throughout the full term of her pregnancy, before, during and after the cesarean section delivery.

  • Discussion
  • Cite Count Icon 65
  • 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.018
Rituximab-induced Elimination of Acquired Angioedema Due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency
  • Aug 1, 2006
  • The American Journal of Medicine
  • Marcel Levi + 2 more

Rituximab-induced Elimination of Acquired Angioedema Due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.1089/ped.2014.0412
Management of Hereditary Angioedema in Childhood
  • Dec 1, 2014
  • Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology
  • Eveline Y Wu + 1 more

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by recurrent, self-limiting attacks of subcutaneous and submucosal edema. Though a majority of patients will experience symptom onset before 20 years of age, there is a paucity of published literature regarding the management of HAE in children and adolescents. Methods: A comprehensive literature review regarding the management of pediatric HAE due to C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency (C1 INH) was performed. Results: A collection of case reports and case series suggest antifibrinolytics and attenuated androgens at low dose are safe and effective options for short- and long-term prophylaxis in pediatric HAE. Plasma-derived C1 INH preparations are available for both on-demand and prophylactic therapy in the United States, and post-hoc analyses of the pediatric patients enrolled in the larger clinical trials support their use in pediatric HAE. Ecallantide and icatibant are kinin-pathway modulators, but only ecallantide is currently approv...

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 109
  • 10.12968/hmed.2019.80.7.391
Hereditary angioedema: an update on causes, manifestations and treatment.
  • Jul 2, 2019
  • British Journal of Hospital Medicine
  • Hilary J Longhurst + 1 more

Hereditary angioedema is a rare genetic disorder caused by deficiency of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) and characterized by recurrent episodes of severe swelling that affect the limbs, face, intestinal tract and airway. Since laryngeal oedema can be life-threatening as a result of asphyxiation, correct diagnosis and management of hereditary angioedema is vital. Hereditary angioedema attacks are mediated by bradykinin, the production of which is regulated by C1-INH. Hereditary angioedema therapy relies on treatment of acute attacks, and short- and long-term prophylaxis. Acute treatment options include C1-INH concentrate, icatibant and ecallantide. Self-administration of treatment is recommended and is associated with increased quality of life of patients with hereditary angioedema. Advances in diagnosis and management have improved the outcomes and quality of life of patients with hereditary angioedema.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 10
  • 10.1007/s13555-021-00593-x
Recognition and Management of Hereditary Angioedema: Best Practices for Dermatologists
  • Aug 30, 2021
  • Dermatology and Therapy
  • Michael E Manning

ObjectiveThe goal of this article is to discuss the importance of differentiating hereditary angioedema (HAE) from other types of angioedema, describe advances in HAE management, especially long-term prophylaxis (LTP), and offer practical recommendations for dermatologists.CommentaryWhile HAE is rare, dermatologists are likely to encounter patients with this condition at some point over the course of their clinical practice due to the fact that HAE episodes typically involve subcutaneous swelling and sometimes erythema marginatum. HAE is characterized by recurrent episodes of painful and/or disabling bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Unfortunately, HAE is commonly mistaken for other conditions such as allergic and other mast cell-mediated angioedema, but has very different treatment requirements. Delayed diagnosis of HAE can result in years of avoidable debilitating symptoms, inappropriate treatment, potentially unnecessary invasive intervention, and reduced quality of life, and can be life threatening. Thus, timely identification of HAE is essential to ensure appropriate clinical management. Patients with HAE have either deficiency or dysfunction of the C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein that inhibits proteases in the contact, complement, and fibrinolytic systems. Pathway-specific HAE treatments include C1INH replacement, kallikrein inhibitors, and bradykinin receptor antagonists. Treatment options for managing acute attacks include C1INH replacement (plasma-derived or recombinant formulations), icatibant (kallikrein inhibitor), and ecallantide (bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist). In the past 5 years, several new options for LTP have been approved, including a subcutaneous plasma-derived C1INH formulation and two kallikrein inhibitors (lanadelumab; berotralstat). Optimal management of HAE entails the creation of a comprehensive management plan that addresses both acute and long-term patient needs and includes input from an HAE expert and the patient/caregivers.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 22
  • 10.1002/14651858.cd013403.pub2
Interventions for the long-term prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks.
  • Nov 3, 2022
  • The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
  • Nicole Beard + 5 more

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a serious and potentially life-threatening condition that causes acute attacks of swelling, pain and reduced quality of life. People with Type I HAE (approximately 80% of all HAE cases) have insufficient amounts of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) protein; people with Type II HAE (approximately 20% of all cases) may have normal C1-INH concentrations, but, due to genetic mutations, these do not function properly. A few people, predominantly females, experience HAE despite having normal C1-INH levels and C1-INH function (rare Type III HAE). Several new drugs have been developed to treat acute attacks and prevent recurrence of attacks. There is currently no systematic review and meta-analysis that included all preventive medications for HAE. To assess the benefits and harms of interventions for the long-term prevention of HAE attacks in people with Type I, Type II or Type III HAE. We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 3 August 2021. We included randomised controlled trials in children or adults with HAE that used medications to prevent HAE attacks. The comparators could be placebo or active comparator, or both; approved and experimental drug trials were eligible for inclusion. There were no restrictions on dose, frequency or intensity of treatment. The minimum length of four weeks of treatment was required for inclusion; this criterion excluded the acute treatment of HAE attacks. We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. HAE attacks (number of attacks per person, per population) and change in number of HAE attacks; 2. mortality and 3. serious adverse events (e.g. hepatic dysfunction, hepatic toxicity and deleterious changes in blood tests). Our secondary outcomes were 4. quality of life; 5. severity of breakthrough attacks; 6. disability and 7. adverse events (e.g. weight gain, mild psychological changes and body hair). We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. We identified 15 studies (912 participants) that met the inclusion criteria. The studies included people with Type I and II HAE. The studies investigated avoralstat, berotralstat, subcutaneous C1-INH, plasma-derived C1-INH, nanofiltered C1-INH, recombinant human C1-INH, danazol, and lanadelumab for the prevention of HAE attacks. We did not find any studies on the use of tranexamic acid for prevention of HAE attacks. All drugs except avoralstat reduced the number of HAE attacks compared with placebo. For breakthrough attacks that occurred despite prophylactic treatment, intravenous and subcutaneous forms of C1-INH and lanadelumab reduced attack severity. It is not known whether other drugs have a similar effect, as the severity of breakthrough attacks in people taking drugs other than C1-INH and lanadelumab was not reported. For quality of life, avoralstat, berotralstat, C1-INH (all forms) and lanadelumab increased quality of life compared with placebo; there were no data for danazol. Four studies reported on changes in disability during treatment with C1-INH, berotralstat and lanadelumab; all three drugs decreased disability compared with placebo. Adverse events, including serious adverse events, did not occur at a rate higher than placebo. However, serious adverse event data and other adverse event data were not available for danazol, which prevented us from drawing conclusions about the absolute or relative safety of this drug. No deaths were reported in the included studies. The analysis was limited by the small number of studies, the small number of participants in each study and the lack of data on older drugs, therefore the certainty of the evidence is low. Given the rarity of HAE, it is not surprising that drugs were rarely directly compared, which does not allow conclusions on the comparative efficacy of the various drugs for people with HAE. Finally, we did not identify any studies that included people with Type III HAE. Therefore, we cannot draw any conclusions about the efficacy or safety of any drug in people with this form of HAE. The available data suggest that berotralstat, C1-INH (subcutaneous, plasma-derived, nanofiltered and recombinant), danazol and lanadelumab are effective in lowering the risk or incidence (or both) of HAE attacks. In addition, C1-INH and lanadelumab decrease the severity of breakthrough attacks (data for other drugs were not available). Avoralstat, berotralstat, C1-INH (all forms) and lanadelumab increase quality of life and do not increase the risk of adverse events, including serious adverse events. It is possible that danazol, subcutaneous C1-INH and recombinant human C1-INH are more effective than berotralstat and lanadelumab in reducing the risk of breakthrough attacks, but the small number of studies and the small size of the studies means that the certainty of the evidence is low. This and the lack of head-to-head trials prevented us from drawing firm conclusions on the relative efficacy of the drugs.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1576235
Real-world evidence of the effectiveness and utilization of subcutaneous C1INH long-term prophylaxis in patients with HAE in Spain and Germany.
  • May 14, 2025
  • Frontiers in immunology
  • Marcus Maurer + 6 more

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) types 1/2 are rare genetic disorders leading to C1 inhibitor (C1INH) deficiency/dysfunction. Guidelines recommend long-term prophylaxis (LTP) to prevent HAE attacks. Subcutaneous (SC) C1INH replacement therapy is approved for LTP in patients with HAE (age indication varies between countries). There is little real-world data on the outcomes of patients who switch to C1INH SC in Europe, particularly those who switch from C1INH IV. This retrospective patient chart analysis captured real-world evidence of the effectiveness of C1INH SC LTP in patients with HAE in Germany (n=69) and Spain (n=37). The primary endpoint was change in annualized attack rate (AAR) in patients who used C1INH IV LTP during a 6-month baseline period and switched to C1INH SC LTP for ≥6 months. Switching to C1INH SC LTP from C1INH IV LTP was associated with a 73.2% reduction in AAR (n=48; P<0.001) compared to baseline. Emergency Room (ER) visits and rescue medication use were also significantly reduced after switching to C1INH SC LTP from C1INH IV LTP. A similar reduction in AAR (68.9%), ER visits (49.8%), and rescue medication use (61.9%) was observed in the overall population (n=105), regardless of treatment at baseline. Similar changes from baseline were seen in patients from Germany and Spain.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 89
  • 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.057
8. Hereditary angioedema
  • Jan 29, 2008
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • Michael M Frank

8. Hereditary angioedema

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 12
  • 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.12.008
COVID-19 triggers attacks in HAE patients without worsening disease outcome
  • Dec 22, 2021
  • The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. in Practice
  • María Margarita Olivares + 34 more

COVID-19 triggers attacks in HAE patients without worsening disease outcome

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 30
  • 10.1111/trf.12674
Treatment of hereditary angioedema: a review (CME).
  • Apr 16, 2014
  • Transfusion
  • Neeti Bhardwaj + 1 more

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of self-limiting tissue swelling. The management of HAE has transformed dramatically with recently approved therapies in the United States. However, there is lack of awareness among physicians about these new modalities. The aim of this review is to update the practicing physician about various therapeutic options available for HAE patients. An exhaustive literature search of PubMed and OVID was performed to develop this article. Management of HAE is traditionally classified into treatment of acute attacks or on-demand therapy, short-term (preprocedural) prophylaxis, and long-term prophylaxis. Newer therapies include C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) and contact system modulators, namely, ecallantide and icatibant. Recombinant C1-INH, which is available in Europe, is awaiting approval in the United States. C1-INH concentrate is approved for prophylaxis as well as on-demand therapy while ecallantide and icatibant are approved for acute treatment only. Effective HAE management further includes patient education, reliable access to specific medications, and regular follow-up to monitor therapeutic response and safety.

  • Supplementary Content
  • Cite Count Icon 19
  • 10.2147/ppa.s86379
Self-administered C1 esterase inhibitor concentrates for the management of hereditary angioedema: usability and patient acceptance
  • Sep 7, 2016
  • Patient preference and adherence
  • Huamin (Henry) Li

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disease characterized by episodic subcutaneous or submucosal swelling. The primary cause for the most common form of HAE is a deficiency in functional C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH). The swelling caused by HAE can be painful, disfiguring, and life-threatening. It reduces daily function and compromises the quality of life of affected individuals and their caregivers. Among different treatment strategies, replacement with C1-INH concentrates is employed for on-demand treatment of acute attacks and long-term prophylaxis. Three human plasma-derived C1-INH preparations are approved for HAE treatment in the US, the European Union, or both regions: Cinryze®, Berinert®, and Cetor®; however, only Cinryze is approved for long-term prophylaxis. Postmarketing studies have shown that home therapy (self-administered or administered by a caregiver) is a convenient and safe option preferred by many HAE patients. In this review, we summarize the role of self-administered plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate therapy with Cinryze at home in the prophylaxis of HAE.

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close