Long-term Outcomes After On-Pump vs Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Abstract

BackgroundA post-hoc analysis of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial was performed to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (coronary artery disease with left ventricular ejection fraction 35% or less). MethodsPatients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery were enrolled from the STICH trial. Operative details, perioperative outcomes, and long-term outcomes were compared in a 1-to-2 propensity score matching cohort. The primary outcome was death from any cause. ResultsAmong 768 included patients operated on between July 2002 and May 2007, 152 (19.8%) received off-pump and 616 (80.2%) received on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In the 1-to-2 matched cohort (152 off pump and 304 on pump), off pump was associated with a higher prevalence of multiple arterial grafting (17.1% vs 8.6%, P = .01) and incomplete revascularization (34.2% vs 17.1%, P < .001). The overall 30-day mortality (3.3% vs 5.3%, P = .34) was comparable between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 8.7 years, off-pump surgery was associated with a similar risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 1.09), with comparable estimated all-cause mortality at 1 year (12.5% vs 11.9%), 5 years (32% vs 32.8%), and 10 years (51.4% vs 62.3%). No significant interaction was detected in the subgroup analyses of incomplete revascularization, multiple arterial grafting, and three-vessel disease. ConclusionsIn patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery could be performed with comparable 30-day mortality and similar long-term survival, and appears to have a lower incidence of perioperative morbidities.