Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) receiving new generation prostheses SAPIEN 3 (S3, Edwards Lifesc.) and Evolut R (ER, Medtronic Inc.) in terms of periprocedural and long-term outcome. Our retrospective, single-center analysis included 359 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR with S3 or ER from 2014–2016 (mean age 82 ± 7 years, 47% male, mean EuroSCORE II 8.0 ± 8%, mean follow-up 3.8 years). Device Success was equal (S3 93.0% vs. ER 92.4%, p = 0.812). We report a 30-day mortality of 2.8% in the S3 group, and 2.1% in the ER group (p = 0.674). There was no difference in stroke, conversion to open surgery, vascular and bleeding complications or myocardial infarction. While prosthesis mean gradients were higher with S3 (12.0 mmHg vs. 8.2 mmHg, p < 0.001), there was a trend to less paravalvular regurgitation (PVR moderate or severe: 1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.088). All-cause mortality up to 5 years did not show a difference (mean survival S3 3.5 ± 0.24 years, ER 3.3 ± 0.29 years, p = 0.895). Independent predictors of long-term mortality were impaired LVEF, chronic kidney injury, peripheral artery disease, malignant tumor and periprocedural stroke. New generation TAVR valves offer an excellent implant and outcome success rate. Long-term survival was independent of prostheses choice and mainly attributed to comorbidities and complications.

Highlights

  • transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the first option for older patients with AS at intermediate or high risk for surgery [2,3]

  • The study population consisted of 359 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral TAVR with a new generation prosthesis

  • The analyzed cohort consisted of patients at intermediate to high surgical risk expressed through a EuroSCORE II of 8.0% and STS Score of 7.3% in mean, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This article is an open access article. Since the first transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in 2002 [1] percutaneous therapy of aortic valve stenosis (AS) has evolved rapidly. TAVR is the first option for older patients with AS at intermediate or high risk for surgery [2,3]. Constant development of bioprosthetic valves and delivery systems have reduced complication rates and improved outcomes over the years [4,5,6,7]. The 3rd generation Edwards SAPIEN 3 Valve

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.