Long-Term Outcome of Surgical Treatments for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Cervicofacial Lymphadenitis in Children

Abstract

Information on long-term treatment outcome for nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) cervicofacial lymphadenitis in children is scarce. The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term outcome for surgical treatment, which is the mainstay treatment modality. This case series describes recurrence rates of surgically treated NTM cervicofacial lymphadenitis patients with a follow-up of at least 10 years. The current study data were partially collected from a randomized, prospective, multicenter, multidisciplinary trial (CHIMED study), which was conducted between 2000 and 2006 to determine the optimal treatment for NTM cervicofacial lymphadenitis in children. After the CHIMED trial inclusion ended, our institute continued to serve as a referral center. This enabled us to enlarge the surgical CHIMED cohort by adding patients who were treated during 2007 to 2010 in our center and collect the rest of the current study data. About 427 children with chronic cervicofacial lymphadenopathy were analyzed. Among these, 290 had microbiologically confirmed cervicofacial mycobacterial infections (n=3 Mycobacterium tuberculosis, n=1 Mycobacterium bovis, n=286 NTM). Of these 286 children with NTM cervicofacial lymphadenitis, 189 were treated surgically (median age: 41 months, range: 9-144, 46.0% males). The affected lymph nodes were excised in 151 children (79.9%), and curettage was performed in 38 children (20.1%). One patient (0.07%) experienced a reactivation/recurrence 2 years after surgical excision and required another surgical excision. Three children (7.9%) experienced infection reactivation/recurrences after curettage, confirmed by redness or a draining fistula, within the first year after healing. Two of these 3 patients were treated with additional surgical excisions. The long-term outcome of surgical excision for NTM cervicofacial lymphadenitis is favorable with a low recurrence rate. Curettage or a conservative wait-and-see approach can be considered an alternative in advanced and surgically challenging cases. However, healing will take longer, and late recurrences are possible.