Abstract
The airway management of children with Robin sequence is controversial. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 59 children (<1 year old) with Robin sequence managed between 2000 and 2010. Robin sequence was defined as the presence of mandibular hypoplasia and clinical signs of airway obstruction. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, the presence of a syndrome, the perinatal period, and the management of airway and nutritional problems. Eighteen children (31%) needed respiratory support because of severe respiratory distress, and a sleep study found obstructive apnoea's in another eight children who had been managed by prone positioning and/or monitoring. In the isolated group significantly fewer children needed respiratory support compared to the non-isolated group. After the age of one year, 10% of the Robin sequence cohort was still in need of treatment for obstructive symptoms. Almost half (47%) needed temporary nutritional support. The prevalence of respiratory distress in children with Robin sequence is high. In most children, treatment with prone positioning was sufficient to relieve the airway obstruction. Successful treatment with prone positioning was significantly more often seen in children with an isolated Robin sequence. About one-third of all Robin sequence children needed respiratory support in the neonatal and/or infant period. However, in childhood, only 10% of the total Robin sequence cohort was still dependent on respiratory support. In this presentation the controversies with regard to airway management will be discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.