Long-term outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: implication for public health

Abstract

Abstract Background The debate on the benefits and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term outcomes is not yet settled. This study aimed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump CABG on long-term outcomes and to evaluate possible public health implications linked to their use. Methods The PRIORITY project was planned to evaluate the long-term outcomes of two prospective multicenter studies on CABG conducted between 2002-2004 and 2007-2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to administrative data in order to retrieve patients' late outcome. Time-to-event distributions were analyzed accordingly to primary event-type (death, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs)) using the Kaplan-Meier and the Cox proportional hazards methods. Results The study population consisted of 11 021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB). The median follow-up time was 8.0 years (interquartile range 7.6-10.0 years). OPCAB had comparable late all-cause mortality to on-pump CABG (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.85-1.03, p = 0.19), but it was associated to an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.06-1.23, p = 0.001). In particular, OPCAB had an increased risk of repeated revascularization with percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI) (adjusted HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.16-1.53, p < 0.001) compared to on-pump CABG. Conclusions OPCAB does not affect long-term mortality, but it significantly increases the risk of MACEs. In particular, OPCAB had an increased risk of repeated revascularization with PCI. These findings may have important implications towards health resources allocation. Key messages Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting strategy is associated with an increased long-term risk of MACE and repeated PCI. Off-pump strategy is mainly based on operator preferences and can have important implications in terms of healthcare costs.