Abstract
Abstract Background Prognosis after a myocardial infarction (MI) have improved consistently over the last decades. In parallel, the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events has been reduced and life expectancy in people free from CV disease improved. Purpose To explore the long-term mortality and burden of cardiovascular disease in patients after a first MI compared to matched controls in a contemporary setting. Methods The Swedish case-control study PAROKRANK recruited 805 patients <75 years with a first MI and 805 age-, gender- and area-matched controls from 2010 to 2014. All participants were followed by means of registry-based information. The primary endpoint was the first of a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke and heart failure hospitalization. Data on the outcomes were provided via linkage to the National Patient Registries and the Cause of Death Registry. Hazard Ratios (HR) for the first composite event were calculated by means of a Cox regression model, subsequently adjusted for smoking, education level and marital status at baseline. Event curves for the time-to-first event in patients and controls were computed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the two groups were compared by means of the log-rank test. Results Data from 804 patients and 800 controls (mean age in both groups 62 years; women 19%) were complete for an average period of 6.2 years (0.2–8.5 years). The total number of events was 211. Patients had a higher event rate than controls (log rank p<0.0001). Unadjusted HR for the primary outcome was 2.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56–2.77) while the adjusted HR was 2.04 (95% CI 1.52–2.73). Mortality did not differ significantly between patients (n=38; 4.7%) and controls (n=35; 4.4%). In total, 82.5% of the patients and 91.3% of the controls were event-free during follow-up. Conclusion This long-term follow-up of a contemporary, nationwide case-control cohort illustrates that the likelihood for CV events is higher in patients with a first MI compared to their matched controls while mortality did not differ. The access to high quality of care and cardiac rehabilitation might explain the low rates of adverse outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): AFA Insurance, Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Society of Medicine, Stockholm County Council (ALF project and Steering committee KI/SLL for odontological research), and The Baltic Child Foundation. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: European Heart Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.