Abstract
BackgroundDrowning is a leading cause of brain injury in children. Long-term outcome data for drowning survivors are sparse. This study reports neurocognitive outcomes for 154 children hospitalized following drowning. MethodsA survey for parent caregivers was distributed online. Likert scale items assessed 10 outcome variables in four domains: motor (three), perception (three), language (three), and social/emotional (one). Cluster analysis, outcome relative risk, and descriptive statistics were applied. ResultsOf 208 surveys received, 154 met inclusion criteria. Coma was the most common admission status (n = 137). Cluster analysis identified three outcome groups: Mild (n = 39), Moderate (n = 75), and Severe (n = 40). Motor impairment with cognitive and perceptual sparing (deefferentation) was present in Moderate (P < 1 × 10−26) and Severe (P < 1 × 10−12) but absent in Mild. Locked-in state was endorsed in both Moderate (83%) and Severe (70%). The strongest predictor of good outcome (Mild) was hospitalization with no medical intervention (relative risk [RR] = 6.7). Responsivity on admission (RR = 4.2) or discharge (RR = 12.22) also predicted good outcome. In-hospital prognostication and counseling predicted outcome weakly (RR = 1.3) or not at all. ConclusionsLong-term outcomes in pediatric drowning ranged widely. Overall, motor impairments exceeded perceptual or cognitive (P < 1 × 10−18), with “locked-in state” endorsed in most (93 of 154). The strongest predictors of good outcome were the lack of necessity for interventions and responsivity on admission or discharge. The eponym “Conrad syndrome” is proposed for locked-in state following nonfatal drowning in children.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.