Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis: comparison of device survival

Abstract

Objectives. To determine the mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis, comparing five different types of devices, as well as the two-piece versus three-piece as a group. Methods. We followed 83 patients with two-piece and 283 patients with three-piece inflatable penile prostheses for a mean time of 66 months. At a cutoff of 63 months, mechanical complication rates were reviewed and statistically analyzed. Results. Thirty-one device-related complications occurred, and all were secondary to fluid leakage. The Mentor Alpha-1 prosthesis was significantly better than the Mentor Mark-II in terms of mechanical reliability ( P = 0.01). A trend was noted toward the AMS 700 Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis having fewer mechanical complications than the Mentor Mark-II ( P = 0.06). In addition, a trend toward all three-piece prostheses being more mechanically reliable than the two-piece was noted ( P = 0.08). The Mentor Alpha-1 device had a higher cumulative proportional survival (0.957) than all other devices (0.842 for AMS 700 Ultrex, 0.839 for AMS 700 CX, 0.783 for Mentor GFS, and 0.750 for Mentor Mark-II). Conclusions. As a group, a trend was noted toward the three-piece prosthesis having better mechanical reliability than the two-piece prosthesis. Comparisons between the individual types of prostheses showed that the Mentor Alpha-1 device was significantly more mechanically reliable than the Mentor Mark-II device, and a trend was noted toward the AMS 700 Ultrex device having fewer mechanical complications than the Mentor Mark-II. The Mentor Alpha-1 prosthesis had the highest cumulative proportional survival.